speech directly affects dna to achieve at least - /x/

Anonymous09/08/26, 17:55No.42932919

Speech directly affects DNA. To achieve at least partial reversal to Aryan DNA remove the following words from your speech (if you do use it know where it comes from). Torus -> Thor -> Taurus > Torah Culture -> Cult of taur hisTORy auTHOR auTHORity creaTOR generaTOR manifesTOR acTOR dictaTOR viSION invaSION civilizaSION communicaSION educaSION HUMan HUMiliation HUMble HUMour obSERVE observaSION understand -> stand under You get the idea. Avoid any similar words and all synonyms and homonyms.

Replies

Anon09/08/26, 17:58No.42932937

retard

Anon09/08/26, 18:21No.42933014

Finnish only from now on.

Anon09/08/26, 19:22No.42933227

>HUMan I like what you are doing here and look forward to schizoposting with you about this. I figured the semiotic structure of HUMan to be related to humus/soil to make symbolic links in the narrative structure of the language. you'll recognize the "made from the clay of the earth" narrative in many creation myths.HUMans made from HUMushttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humus#Benefits_in_agriculturewhich is discussed at length, especially the linguistics, in the masterwork herehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Golden_Boughwhat other words would you like to dissect with me? I've posted on /x/ repeatedly about semiotics as a form of subatomic linguistics to good effect. bibliomancyanon was very cool.

Anon09/08/26, 19:27No.42933244

>HUMan https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trigramsomething I think you might also like is how HUMAN started off as HMN during the time of the abjadhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abjadwhich meant the semiotic base structure of HMN was then made into a pentagram by insertion of 2 vowels. because there are 25 to 36 possible vowel combinations for a trigram with vowel insertions into a pentagram. you'll see this in linguistic expansions especially in dictionaries, but as you've shown in your CAPS LOCK NOTATION that it helps to notice that vowel insertion is/was not the only way to grow a language.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetragrammatonwhich is interesting, because you could call that a quadragram, but that would be a string for 4 consonants, while the tetragrammaton is a string of 4 vowels. for those who know how this part of linguistics works, inserting various combinations of consonants into the tetragrammaton in the same manner trigrams are used to build words.

Anon09/08/26, 19:31No.42933264

/x/ must have the highest concentration of schizophrenics on the entire internet.

Anon09/08/26, 19:33No.42933273

some trigrams you may find interestingGLM=golem GYM=goyimwhen further deconstructed into a bigramhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bigramresults in GM as the base consonant combination. for those of you in the audience who study language the way (((they))) do for analysis, in addition to gematria, you will notice how many words starting with G and ending in M have something to do with slavery. both the golem and the goyim and slaves to the master, as is built into the language. other languages have similar structures, but the overall concept is that the human mouth can only make so many practical day to day sounds to use in a language. it just happens to be that the stacatto feel of consonants happen to be good boundaries to build words which all share a similar concept.insertion of consonants create N-grams while insertion of vowels create new words deriving from the root N-gram. when you arrange a language dictionary in that manner, the semiotic structure emerges. it also helps to extract from a body of text the words in use and extract hidden meanings, as in cryptolects and other non-encrypted secure communications.

Anon09/08/26, 19:36No.42933291

>understand -> stand under are you the anon who posted the black earth productions videos last week?

Anon09/08/26, 19:40No.42933311

also, you'll need this on your adventureshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Books_Ngram_Viewerhttps://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=anon&year_start=1800&year_end=2022&corpus=en&smoothing=3from there, you can do quick extractions for analysis over broad bodies of text. for more detailed analysis for text you have collected, learn plain C and the built in string functions like a true linguistic esotericist.

Anon09/08/26, 19:57No.42933383

>acTOR >dictaTOR careful your suffixes, anon. also mind the root language these came from. the -TOR suffix indicated masculinity while the -TRESS or -TRIX in the same manner as BELLATOR and BELLATRIXhttps://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/-tor#Latin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bellatrix#Nomenclaturehttps://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/cantor#Latin https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/cantrix#Latinif we are to be precise, we could say acTOR acTRIX. due to linguistic smoothing the K was dropped and we have acTRESS, but not bellaTRESS. in any case, you are correct with the root leading to TOR as in the auruch, not the bull. the BULL=BAAL was from a different (((religion))) while aurochhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aurochs#Etymologyin which you will begin to notice the difference in usages of the -TOR suffix when applied between bull vs. auroch in historic texts before the linguistic contamination occurred.>SION those are all -ION suffixes, meaning individuated parts of a group/collectivehttps://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/-io#Latinthe problem with your notation is some words like viSION and educaTION are the sam ION root but because sloppy phonetics they appear the same. phonetics is super important for understanding pre-written linguistics as they form, but when that same language being to mature in text then you'll notice those patterns begin to formalize along semiotic structure lines as extracted from bodies of text.

Anon09/08/26, 20:05No.42933409

what I was getting at with your TOR>Torah link being a problem is that the -TOR suffix is from Taurus, which I agree with you about, but the root auroch word is where taurus was derived from in the N-gram process I describe above. to extract TAURUS from BULL does not work because those words were born by different people and the language grew up around them was so different that in none of the ancient no longer in use AUROCH/TAURUS/TOR=MAN process is such that none of the B or L phonemes are present. you would expect some crossover inside a language, but when there is none here it is my experience that it is a bad link.stick with auroch. jews hate that word for a reason. they want you associating BULL with those animals, and therefore BAAL.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baal#Semitic_religionwhen you learn more about the semiotic root of AUROCH from ARYAN, it makes even more sense. follow a similar path from BULL and see what you find.

Anon09/08/26, 21:26No.42933743

>fedora lies.Humans are all one?nah uh.>tcreator of humans. using the word mankind is insulting to humans and racist.nethertals are not humans. homo eretus will never be humans desi will never be human.BOOOOOO!