eugen games - /vst/

Anonymous03/23/25, 24:52No.1993589Eugen Games

Wargame Warno Steel Division I'm having a lot of fun in warno

110

Replies

Anon03/23/25, 24:52No.1993590

owned

Anon03/23/25, 24:53No.1993591

posting some old /wgg/ memes

Anon03/23/25, 24:54No.1993592

Anon03/23/25, 24:56No.1993593

Anon03/23/25, 24:57No.1993595

Anon03/23/25, 24:58No.1993596

Anon03/23/25, 24:59No.1993597

Anon03/24/25, 12:50No.1995045

Played a bit of RD back in the day, got SD2 mostly for the campaignsWhich are the ones to buy, I only got Burning Baltics.

Anon03/25/25, 17:36No.1996224

Cluster mortar nerf

Anon03/25/25, 19:13No.1996293

>Eugen >nerfing PACT in any significant way lmao

Anon03/25/25, 22:11No.1996485

>no China >no Finland >no Yugoslavia >no Israel >no Japan Why is Eugen so fucking retarded? I don't care about some gay Belgian 25th LGBT Division. Give me the good stuff.

Anon03/25/25, 23:40No.1996548

they removed chinook spamming because FAGToids cried too much. ebin.

Anon03/27/25, 14:53No.1997946

Oh boy, a THIRD meta pact t72 spam deck to go with 9th and circle

Anon03/29/25, 12:09No.2000064

>Randomized names for each individual tank WARNO wishes it had this level of soul.

Anon03/29/25, 13:21No.2000117

Which one of these games has good sp campaigns ? I played steel division 2 those were kinda fun, especially some of the german ones with captured equipment and russian collaborationist units

Anon03/30/25, 04:43No.2000895

Steel Division 2 SUCKS

Anon04/04/25, 03:26No.2006520

>make one of the best rts games of all time >make slop ever since why wont they make a sequel bros

Anon04/08/25, 17:56No.2012100

any advice for a WG:RD USSR Moto deck?

Anon04/10/25, 15:48No.2014378

t72m1s + Dana + kub + mig 29 + bmp2s + vysadkari

Anon04/10/25, 23:22No.2015042

So...

Anon04/13/25, 22:57No.2018329

I've been going super negative in 10v10s but i'm generally pushing into the points I need to push into and am winning most games

Anon04/27/25, 14:55No.2021090

I wish I could get into Warno. I played a ton of European Escalation but nothing after it captured that magic.

Anon04/27/25, 16:52No.2021126

This guy knows.

Anon05/04/25, 20:55No.2026135

Finally bit the bullet and picked up Warno on sale. Anything I should know as I dive in and start learning?

Anon05/05/25, 17:46No.2026749

>Eugen Games Sure. I liked Times of Conflict https://www.myabandonware.com/game/times-of-conflict-dj0

Anon05/10/25, 01:58No.2031684

Are there India or Pakistan units in Red Dragon? I want to live out my prediction for the war.

Anon05/19/25, 14:57No.2041575

What's the point of Army General? It's so basic, it gets boring after a few battles, because no matter what you do, every time you fight the same skirmish.

Anon05/22/25, 18:09No.2045076

It's always hilarious when a pactoid tasks an entire grad at one unit in a forest

Anon05/22/25, 23:46No.2045457

Okay. I've played all the tutorials I've cleared a bunch of the scenario missions I've cleared 2 of the AG campaigns I've got all my hotkeys and RoEs set up I looked up some info online and used that to make a 3rd Armoured deck (apparently it's good for team games?)What should I know before I dive into 10v10s?

Anon05/25/25, 24:49No.2047721

jesus christ this game

Anon05/25/25, 13:41No.2048123

Just carried a 10v10 for the first time with this. Me and a 4th dutch player fought off 4, then 5 members of the enemy team over a point, eventually ground out all their decks over the course of 30 minutes and took their rear +2 to win.Thoughts?

Anon05/26/25, 24:04No.2048843

all of this for a fucking draw

Anon05/26/25, 15:43No.2049421

God I love the polish divisions, I wish they got better manpads, and ATGMs and they'd be perfect.

Anon05/26/25, 15:59No.2049434

So now that SOUTHAG divisions are pretty much all revealed, which ones look the most/least interesting?Personally, I'm pretty let down by it. All of the pact divisions shown so far are just more of what we already have but with DLC powercreep. They're all just heavy divs with cheap, cost-effective tanks and transports and good cheap infantry like every other pact division, except moreso. Meanwhile all of the NATO divs are these weird hybrid light armoured things that seem overly geared to 1v1s by having a little bit of everything and all the fast earlygame rush vehicles. >Look it's an airborne div except it also gets a full tank tab, a full set of cost-effective non-AB infantry and all the assets of a mechanized div and all of its reservists aren't reservists because lol >oh look it's 5E again except more minmaxed >oh look it's 5E but spanish >Oh look it's that shitty french reservist deck nobody plays, but moreso And I don't even know what the fuck is going on with Canada. It's like the Belgians except with wunderwaffe.The germans look like they were purpose-built to be the best 1v1 deck in the game and a direct upgrade to the already extremely good 2.PzG and will spend the next year being steadily nerfed. The rest are all either just copying the existing template of a meta div or doing clownshit that's either going to be broken hinging on like 2 overtuned cards and get nerfed to D-tier or will start in D-tier and never leave. And all the pact divs are either just going to directly powercreep their base game counterpart or fail to powercreep them and be rendered redundant in the same way that 7th Panzer makes 9th Panzer obsolete.Have we really reached the point of saturation where no new div archetype is possible without just remaking an existing div, but better/worse?

Anon05/26/25, 23:46No.2049928

>buying WARNO dlc lmao. the only DLC i have is from buying the game early access. basegame+early access DLC has all the divs i'll ever need.

Anon05/28/25, 23:29No.2052219

Give me one good reason I shouldn't run 3 cards of Kda shutzen and rule the forest with east german meatwaves

Anon05/29/25, 17:51No.2052904

Final SOUTHAG division revealed. As expected it's just a generic soviet tank division with almost no new units, packed with shitter reservists borrowed from other pact divs and padded out with recycled assets from SD2.So basically what's now on offer for SOUTHAG PACT: Three czech divisions that are just reskins of EG 4th/7th/KdA A soviet T72 spam div to match all the other pact T72 spam divs because T72s are OP right now A soviet reserve division to flip SD2 assets NATO: A french tank division with no tanks That french reservist division that nobody plays, but more 5e but spanish the canadian wunderwaffe corps And 2nd pzg except with more powercreepHonestly looks even worse than NORTHAG. At least the polish brought coffin launchers and US 9th which was kind of unique. The czechs are literally just east germans without resolute, which is probably the biggest letdown of the whole bundle.

Anon05/30/25, 03:29No.2053400

I miss when Wargame was more active nearly 10 years ago.

Anon05/31/25, 02:51No.2054592

helicopter spammer not

Anon06/01/25, 15:58No.2056133

Important question: How much is a body worth in an infantry squad? I'm building 5e and I'm looking on one side at Grenadier-Voltigeurs (FR-F1) for 60pts or Chasseurs for 50pts. They have identical loadouts, the same AT and squad weapons. But the more expensive squad has 2 more bodies (and thus 2 more ARs) for 10 more points. That's ostensibly 5pts per rifleman. Is that worth the cost?Transport options are moot here because I want to bring them in a truck. This is just a fast-cheap squad I want to be able to throw into town fight for tempo earlygame while the transport refunds. But just in general I don't really know if it's worthwhile to pay 5pts per rifleman for the bigger squad, or if it's more cost-effective to get a very well-equipped 8-man squad for 50.

Anon06/07/25, 16:53No.2061241

Anon06/11/25, 20:19No.2065251

>decide to try out Warno's army general >thrown into the enemy's first turn cold with no chance to survey the map or my assets >apparently I'm already being attacked, but the UI forbids me from seeing what's attacking me >thrown into an obviously randomized map with no bearing on the terrain I was attacked in >on my deployment I spread out recon to cover the width of the map in case the AI tries sneaking past me >5 minutes later there are enemy units spawning in behind me >enemy artillery constant targeting unrevealed units it can't see because it just has mapwide targeting >also they get planes that constantly spam blind air strikes in unspotted units and the only AA I get are 5 fucking stingers >victory objectives require me to sit on a +5 for 40 minutes or kill two decks worth of T55s >do this, and try to minimize tank losses as much as possible >post-battle results just delete another 20 tanks anyways because I scored a Major victory instead of a Total victory, silly me >another battle immediately triggers elsewhere on the same turn and I'm expected to go through this shit again without even saving in between This is ass. Why is this so fucking ass? It's like every conscious decision here was made with the express purpose of making this as frustrating, tedious and unintuitive as possible.

Anon06/13/25, 24:30No.2066195

I hate to be such a complainer but there are so many things about Warno that drive me nuts. Let's take 8th Infantry for example. Looks like a fun div, kind of a US Unspec deck. But then you dig into it. >Forced to use either trucks or M113's, no Bradleys, kind of annoying, not even one card of Fire Teams, but made worse by that Shitbox APC's are so overpriced. They should be 10 points period. Trucks are faster, and sellable. You should be paying a premium for that. >Oh cool, Rangers. Except, for some reason, they don't have AT-4's. So they're just Mech Rifles, except marginally better at Inf combat. Why? Why can't they just give them a good AT so they make sense as a unit? This isn't WGRD where Special Forces rape Regulars, they're barely better but 15 pts more. >Tank tab. Why is the CEV so shit? It only does 3 HE (kills 3 guys) and a EIGHTEEN second reload time. Why is the M1A1 275 points when it basically has exactly the same stats as the T-72M1 except 1 more pen and range, and the range matters less in Warno because of the bonkers range compression where 175M is actually like 50M of 'real' distance >Recon. Pretty standard, except why does the LRS only have 6 men? Not gonna lie, I really don't like the non-standardized infantry squad sizes. I don't feel like Eugen really accounts for these HP differences. This basically means this deck doesn't have good shock inf combat recon. And the scouts have no AT. >AA. Oh look its the m163 CS like WGRD, except its dogshit in this game, and to make it worse its 60 points which is 30 WGRD points which is 10 points more. And it was actually GOOD in WGRD, it had a fun characteristic where it could basically shoot without reloading. Nothing like that here. >AIR. Why the fuck does the F-111 suck so hard? It drops all of these 1lb bombs that do no damage. It's straight up a broken unit It's all the little things that add up lol. It's just like they don't think about common sense GAMEPLAY.

Anon06/17/25, 01:04No.2069090

will warno die? i hear it's still having a lot of crashes lmao.

Anon06/17/25, 16:27No.2069502

what eugen game should i play. pick only 1.