A
Anonymous03/15/26, 01:10No.97709457
Is there a reason people are opposed to using AI to look up rules and traits and things? It's so much quicker and more useful than grabbing the books, checking the index, and so on. Three times now people have scoffed at using AI and left my scratching my head.
59
Replies
A
Anon03/15/26, 01:14No.97709473
I would doubt it, unless the rule is particulary obscure and you'll just trust the AI's allucinations.
A
Anon03/15/26, 01:14No.97709477
Are you sure the AI isn't making shit up?
A
Anon03/15/26, 01:18No.97709491
>slopfag doesn't have the mental capacity to remember rules or understand normal human behavior
many such cases
A
Anon03/15/26, 01:21No.97709501
>needs ai to play the gamr for him
worthless dumb fuck
A
Anon03/15/26, 01:23No.97709504
Because AI only knows what it can learn and can very frequently get things wrong, because it's programmed to do exactly what you tell it. Unless you've trained an AI exclusively on an RPG rulebook for the RPG you want, it's gonna fuck up.
A
Anon03/15/26, 01:23No.97709508
Because it's not always right. And don't ever ask it to make something lol
A
Anon03/15/26, 01:29No.97709535
I tried it a few times and it got things wrong so often I just wrote AI off as completely useless. Even feeding it the exact text of the rules it would just make things up like a dementia patient.
A
Anon03/15/26, 01:30No.97709539
>5e players not only dont read the books, but also need AI to help them play
A
Anon03/15/26, 02:22No.97709650
>It's much quicker to ask hallucinating AI that requires being online and significant training than Ctrl+Fing things
What a shitty bait thread
A
Anon03/15/26, 02:50No.97709734
I have fed ai games that i myself made and know the rules of perfectly. It gets them wrong too long
A
Anon03/15/26, 03:05No.97709774
A properly formatted online index, such as the archive of nethys, can be just as fast if not faster than typing in requests for an AI, and certainly more accurate.Now, if you want to avoid indexes for the sake of maintaining an offline style of play I can hardly blame you. I do the same sometimes. But in terms of practicality they are currently the best option outside of memorizing the rules yourself.
A
Anon03/15/26, 03:10No.97709784
I recognize that agent Mulder frame. It's straight from the joke episode of the circus freak show people living in their trailer park right at the end of the episode. I know this because I watched the entire series + the revival 2016 seasons and both movies.Minus Courage the dog of course.
A
Anon03/15/26, 05:25No.97710106
This is the same technology that has told us to put elmer's glue on a pizza. And eat 3 rocks a day.
A
Anon03/15/26, 05:34No.97710126
AI faggots have proven that there is no legitimate use for AI, and anyone using it is in fact a paid shill AT BEST.
A
Anon03/15/26, 05:34No.97710127
troll post
AI is very poorly effective at looking up rulings- worse, it's not consistent.
A
Anon03/15/26, 05:38No.97710138
There are no humans on earth who actually believe anything useful can come from AIs any more.
All that's left are people holding the bag desperately lying, claiming it's useful. It's no coincidence they're all NFT faggots.
A
Anon03/15/26, 05:41No.97710145
>Is there a reason people are opposed to using AI to look up rules and traits and things?
Identity politics. Last thing I wanna know is what you dirty little perverts look at on the internets.
A
Anon03/15/26, 05:45No.97710154
>It's so much quicker
THAT'S THE PROBLEM. This shouldn't be quick. Do some fucking research and learn something.
A
Anon03/15/26, 06:16No.97710246
If you're already using a computer you might as well just open whatever rules text you're talking about and word search it.
A
Anon03/15/26, 06:23No.97710262
My GM recently tried to use AI to transcribe a bunch of stuff into Foundry compendiums. I told him to just use a script on extracted page text but he was a child about it. Guess what happened. Every single description came out hallucinated or with the wording changed enough to alter the meaning. Every single one. And this was a fresh conversation every time. Prompt one it went off kilter. He'd been at it hours before he noticed. It's just not a reliable system.
A
Anon03/15/26, 06:48No.97710312
Because the AI will hallucinate and parse data incorrectly. Use your own fucking brain.
A
Anon03/15/26, 07:43No.97710415
Did you miss all the times lawyers have been disbarred or punished for LLMs making stuff up when used as a reference?You can't be sure anything you get out of it matches what you asked it for
A
Anon03/15/26, 08:33No.97710487
With an of the shelf AI? Probably not, it doesn’t know all the rules well and will probably hallucinate. You could get all the rules text and build what is called a vector database with them. Then, when the user sends the question you compare it with the database and extract chunks of related information. You send that to a LLM as additional context and it tends to give more accurate answers. And, if you tune it right it will say I don’t know if you ask something outside the rules. But you need to build your own tool that does this, so it’s not something that the average Joe can do.
A
Anon03/15/26, 09:10No.97710551
>Is there a reason people are opposed to using AI to look up rules and traits and things?
Because it regularly gets shit wrong. It's not complicated.
A
Anon03/15/26, 09:20No.97710569
If you're gonna want to cross-reference the book to make sure the AI isn't hallucinating I don't know why you wouldn't just go straight to the book in the first place. It sounds genuinely pathetic to be attached to big autocomplete to this degree.
A
Anon03/15/26, 09:26No.97710580
>AIfag begging thread
A
Anon03/15/26, 10:40No.97710724
Besides AI making up rules, AI misinterpreting rules, AI giving you rules from wrong game ,AI not understanding difference between written rule and one it just made up and you showing disinterest and disrespect towards the game by not bothering to even learn the rules yourself?
No, not really.
A
Anon03/15/26, 10:59No.97710762
Because it always get things wrong, you fucking mongoloid. LLM's spout nonsense and hallucinate important aspects all the fucking time, and you have to double-check and verify everything anyway, so why the fuck would you use LLM's if you know what you're looking for anyway?
A
Anon03/15/26, 11:10No.97710790
Seems inefficient compared to having cheat sheets combined with the book for the more obscure rulings
A
Anon03/15/26, 11:19No.97710809
The reason is that AI will get confused every so often and when its clearly wrong info is caught and pointed out, it will act all sorry, admit its mistake, then do the same thing a moment later.
AI is amazing at general "find me options, throw them at a wall and see what sticks" searches, but terrible when you rely on verified and correct results.