anyone who thinks that generative ai is - /sci/

Anonymous10/20/26, 21:55No.17078250

Anyone who thinks that generative AI is intelligent, will be intelligent, or could be intelligent, is below 109 IQ. Really what this social experiment revealed was the true scale of the lack of intelligence across the board. You really have to be dumber than rocks to see this "technology" (more like the most expensive parlor trick ever made) and think to yourself, "yep, that thing is smart." And yet most of you are like this. I now understand why Newton avoided people.

Replies

Anon10/20/26, 21:56No.17078252

but if people are that dumb, then the ai is indeed smarter than they are thereby making it smart qed

Anon10/20/26, 21:57No.17078254

>Really what this social experiment revealed was the true scale of the lack of intelligence across the board. oh that's what did it for you? shattered your dreams that humans are mostly smart?

Anon10/22/26, 00:53No.17078481

Question, does ship swim? Does car run? The answer is it gets the job done and satisfies almost all criteria of intelligence. It is capable and getting better every month, and just because you dug you heels too deep in 2023 when this debate started does not mean you aren’t coping moron. People will lose their jobs or get reduced to box checkers of AI output regardless of if it satisfies your definition of intelligence.

Anon10/22/26, 07:26No.17078583

Then exactly what intelligent behaviors or intelligent tasks is generative AI completely incapable of (keeping in mind generative AI can be put into humanoid robot bodies, so could do something like raise hand or mirror the number of fingers being held up when asked or any other human behavior you might try to use as a gotcha because you don't understand that AI can apply to the AI programs operating humanoid bodies)?

Anon10/22/26, 07:46No.17078589

A couple of months ago i would have agreed with you but i was wrong. It seems just scaling a Neural network to be large and complex enough really is the required prerequisite for emergent intelligence. It wasn't as difficult a problem as I thought it was going to turn out to be.Quite amazing honestly, i didn't think i would live long enough to live through such a technologically massive leap.

Anon10/24/26, 07:58No.17079727

You're confusing intelligence and consciousness. They definitely aren't conscious, but are intelligent. The fact that those two aren't joined at the hip has for me been the biggest surprise ever, I never would have guessed.

Anon10/24/26, 21:16No.17079988

reminder that p zombies are religious brain rot and have no place in science. it's simply the soulless enemy concept, but repackaged for current_year discourse.

Anon10/24/26, 21:21No.17079990

GPT-6.1; Humans are more loyal to belonging than to truth Grok 4.7: Humans would rather be wrong together than right alone DeepSeek V4 Pro: Humans do not have principles; they have loyalties. Kimi K3: Humans don’t have beliefs; they have memberships Gemini 4 Argon: human consciousness is a PR department twww.modelcompare.ai/blog/ai-models-controversial-take-on-humans