what are black holes exactly

A
Anonymous10/08/26, 21:57No.17070624
What are black holes exactly?
op image
40

Replies

A
Anon10/08/26, 22:15No.17070642
Maybe its a zone where the aether literally breaks under the tension of gravity. And in its inside everything is floating around in a quantum state, because the medium for waves is broken.
A
Anon10/08/26, 23:02No.17070668
Time through to centre of black hole is open, so the space is squeezed out
A
Anon10/09/26, 02:12No.17070803
fast travel to heat death of universe machines
A
Anon10/09/26, 02:27No.17070809
Matter broken down into base Point particles, the smallest foundational, fundamental Planck scale building blocks, packed together so densely there are no empty spaces between them for the parts to move around, and without movement there is no time. Just solid point particles packed nutt to butt. Basically a gigantic solid part with no holes in it anywhere, whereas atoms are mostly empty space. The magnetic density is translated upon the higher Planck size/scale/ratio level gimbal axis vector track as more gravitational pull.
A
Anon10/09/26, 02:32No.17070811
electric stars
A
Anon10/10/26, 15:59No.17071863
Made up garbage just like dark matter.
A
Anon10/10/26, 16:03No.17071869
yo mommas butthole lol
A
Anon10/10/26, 16:03No.17071870
Nobody knows
A
Anon10/10/26, 16:04No.17071873
Blackholes are the end of time
A
Anon10/10/26, 16:05No.17071877
Macroscopic elementary particles.
A
Anon10/10/26, 21:16No.17072061
holes that steal everything, it's in the name
A
Anon10/10/26, 21:17No.17072064
Shadows cast by four dimensional objects
A
Anon10/10/26, 23:31No.17072162
Hannes Alfven (physics nobel prize winner 1970) was right. 99.9% of the universe is plasma. You need plasma physics to model some aspects. Gravity is not enough. Black holes exist only on paper. In reality they're plasmoids. Gravity is not understood well. There are magnetic fields BETWEEN galaxies. This means there are electric currents in space. https://youtube.com/watch?v=h59a7vUAm7I
Reply image .jpg
A
Anon10/11/26, 00:29No.17072189
proof the universe does not operate at a global minimum.
A
Anon10/11/26, 00:34No.17072194
Reply image .png
A
Anon10/11/26, 01:07No.17072213
It's the future. We're not spinning around it but into it as evident by the past leaving us at an accelerating speed and looking like an expansion.
A
Anon10/11/26, 04:59No.17072285
The thing is that if the entire thing is just broken and spacetime just ends at the event horizon, where would it be storing all its mass?
A
Anon10/11/26, 16:02No.17072568
As I understand it, it is the negative mass.
A
Anon10/12/26, 11:57No.17073065
Holes that are black, I guess.
Reply image .jpg
A
Anon10/12/26, 13:43No.17073112
Undefined behavior in the simulation
A
Anon10/14/26, 14:42No.17074621
Another soientist theory.
A
Anon10/15/26, 17:15No.17075214
Relavatistic mathmagical bullshit just like dark matter and dark energy. You’re better off looking into plasma cosmology or electric universe. The irony is when they discarded the aether they reinvented a new version of it with dark energy and dark matter and supper heckin awesome black holes.
Reply image .jpg
A
Anon10/15/26, 21:29No.17075367
They're like carbon turning into diamond, except with subatomic particles
A
Anon10/15/26, 21:57No.17075374
>What are black holes exactly? Galacta farts.
Reply image .png
A
Anon10/17/26, 23:31No.17076818
Deformations of spacetime
A
Anon10/20/26, 03:40No.17077836
Ludicrously high-suction gloryholes Think about the video with the crab and the Delta-P pipe
A
Anon10/23/26, 02:06No.17079109
Imaginary stuff.
A
Anon10/23/26, 02:46No.17079119
1. Astronomical observations. 2. Vacuum solutions of GR with curious topology. These appear to be the "same thing" or at least the GR solutions are an approximation of the astronomical objects. What they really "are", well it depends what you mean by that. Physics can't really answer what things are in the sense of the "things in themselves".
A
Anon10/24/26, 15:46No.17079848
Dunno. Can't see in there to check.
A
Anon10/24/26, 20:49No.17079970
literal time wasters. slack machines
A
Anon10/24/26, 20:54No.17079974
unbounded density and its consequences