ai did a hiroshima nagasaki

Replies

A

Anon10/08/26, 15:55No.17070295

literally October 7-1, but noone liked my SI generated meme :( [/sci/thread/17070267#p17070267]

1

A

Anon10/08/26, 16:03No.17070300

>Calculator can multiply numbers faster than any human >It’s over for mathematicians it’s time to become a cambodian rice farmer

4

A

Anon10/08/26, 18:57No.17070456

>mathematicians call for the rising of the sea >the sea rises (llm theorem proving harness rl becomes viable) >"no not like that" AKA "this is cheating it's not the sea rising"you just love to see the luddite cope

1

A

Anon10/08/26, 22:32No.17070646

I mean, post-nuke Japan was a flourishing country, but vastly altered. Perhaps if there was one more nuke, the country could even be decent. Maybe the same will happen to math.

0

A

Anon10/08/26, 22:39No.17070651

Math as it was understood pre 2026? Yes, that's finished. But it will transform. As of now, AI is the calculator for proofs. Proofs will become like arithmetic problems, trivial. The work will shift to higher levels that are difficult to articulate now. Some time later, these higher levels will also be taken over by AI. From then on, it's "human flourishing" all the way down.

0

A

Anon10/08/26, 23:29No.17070677

bad day for chinese nerds

0

A

Anon10/08/26, 23:44No.17070685

I was just thinking of getting some maths qualifications but now I wonder if there even any point.

0

A

Anon10/09/26, 02:38No.17070822

TMD

0

A

Anon10/09/26, 04:49No.17070879

What the hell is "human flourishing" lmao? Nigga, just learn plumbing.

0

A

Anon10/09/26, 05:06No.17070882

The great thing about AI solving all the math problems is that everyone will realize that none of it mattered anyway.

0

A

Anon10/09/26, 05:30No.17070887

>Carpet bomb a field with tens of thousands of sloppa papers that it will take experts decades to comb through, slowing down actual progress even further. We did it, Patrick! We saved research!

1

A

Anon10/11/26, 12:09No.17072413

Yes.

0

A

Anon10/11/26, 12:34No.17072436

STOP THE MATH COUNT!

0

A

Anon10/14/26, 11:14No.17074457

How do you make humans flourish? Hundreds of Hiroshimas and Nagasakis?

0

A

Anon10/15/26, 18:32No.17075260

In four years time, researchers in every faculty will just be using AI as part of their standard practice, and science will be proceeding very very efficiently. The future is looking good, and mathematicians are going to be making insane progress

0

A

Anon10/16/26, 18:38No.17076042

min max plants and what do you need to dowe are gardeners forgetting that is the most cucked thing we could do

0

A

Anon10/17/26, 22:53No.17076806

Maths were always for autists dabbling and paving the way for physicists to use later. A chatbot will never get drunk and make up some nonsense that turns out to solve faster than light travel a century later

0

A

Anon10/17/26, 22:55No.17076807

more like it struck the north and south ivory towers...

0

A

Anon10/18/26, 00:10No.17076826

holy mother of all astroturfing, are these shills really trying to force these memes now? Especially now that NS flop might not even pass peer review? >lean proof is gibberish that has no relation to NL proof and might not even relate to NS at all >NL proof is neither necessarily original nor does it cover the important cases

1

A

Anon10/18/26, 01:39No.17076844

I bet Leonard Euler would have loved AI“Where we’re going, we won’t need eyes to see”, “Where we’re going, we won’t need brains to think”, etc

0

A

Anon10/18/26, 01:41No.17076845

God forbid the entities comprised of pure maths be better at maths than us normie flesh and blood mortalsSam Altman is still a huge wiener though

0

A

Anon10/20/26, 15:46No.17078031

さようなら Sayōnara mathies

0

A

Anon10/20/26, 16:40No.17078063

>human flourishing the fuck is that buzzword even supposed to mean? and why would AI ceos and AIbros have any interest in pursuing it

1

A

Anon10/23/26, 19:06No.17079419

what's next AI does a 9/11 on physics?

0