3 years of super intelligence formerly artificial

Replies

A

Anon10/01/26, 06:20No.17065888

>proved Navier-Stokes >not intelligentPick one

7

A

Anon10/01/26, 09:19No.17065920

>AI is bad because it's not intelligent >AI is bad because it's too intelligent

1

A

Anon10/01/26, 10:41No.17065963

Based No improvement on any open physics problems at all for that matter

2

A

Anon10/03/26, 03:10No.17067000

ReTruthed

0

A

Anon10/05/26, 01:01No.17067971

trvke

0

A

Anon10/07/26, 03:19No.17068978

Intelligence itself is not as intelligent as we think. Also theory of everything is retarded religious nitwittery

0

A

Anon10/07/26, 14:32No.17069350

Here's a ToE for you.E = mc^2 + SI

1

A

Anon10/07/26, 16:30No.17069401

the theory of everything won't be found until scientists admit Earth is flat

4

A

Anon10/08/26, 08:14No.17070004

we have all the data from experiments required to figure out ToE if AI can't figure out ToE then either ToE doesn't exist or AI isn't intelligent ToE is the ultimate proof of intelligence because the AI can't just cheat it and find the solution in some data it stole, or connect some two stupid facts together by luck

1

A

Anon10/12/26, 16:10No.17073222

It certainly isn't.

0

A

Anon10/13/26, 22:43No.17074145

And even less progress on the vertiginous question

1

A

Anon10/15/26, 02:51No.17074923

People who panic over AI are mediocre, real quality can never be replaced.

0

A

Anon10/17/26, 07:06No.17076428

can't wait for AI to debunk quantum "probability" scam and find hidden variables

1

A

Anon10/18/26, 14:09No.17077024

It will never be intelligent.

0

A

Anon10/18/26, 15:39No.17077049

Senile Idiot

0

A

Anon10/18/26, 22:22No.17077175

AI proved that math is not science but intellectual masturbation.

3

A

Anon10/20/26, 16:15No.17078052

Only by accepting the techings of the Catholic church you could hope of having a ToE; sience still rejects Rome and God

0

A

Anon10/20/26, 18:56No.17078124

Artificial Jew will have to plagiarize a lot of work to make any progress on anything. Just like Einstein.

1

A

Anon10/26/26, 09:14No.17080691

ToE was proven mathematically impossible by Cantor and Godel a century before AI was even viable.

1

A

Anon10/26/26, 22:03No.17080993

At least we have Yang Mills/QCD existence now

0

A

Anon10/26/26, 22:17No.17081004

>super intelligence >artificial intelligence >superior intelligenceI'm hesitant of saying what I believe is the best thing to call AI, simply because I don't want it to stick and be responsible for renaming AI, but I'm kinda sick of seeing all the inane alternatives. The best and most accurate "descriptive" name that fits LLMs is "automated intelligence." It an do anything a human has done before, and it can do it on auto-pilot mode and at the speed of super fast computers, but it can't do anything new or original without a human guidance. Hence, it's merely another form of automation. Don't give me credit for this plz.

2

A

Anon10/27/26, 03:38No.17081120

>a result that gives a mathematically rigorous existence proof of certain interacting quantum field theories containing gauge fields and fermions in four dimensions, including Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) and a unified completion of the Standard Model of particle physics.uh so did OpenAI beat OP?

0

A

Anon10/27/26, 08:54No.17081219

also >Then why did you skip it? i did not, i meant trivial in the sense of something entirely understood as a system, such as for example the addition of small whole numbers

1

A

Anon10/27/26, 11:31No.17081296

What about Gwaihir?

0

A

Anon10/30/26, 10:40No.17083044

This COPIUM itt is ghetting outdated while the thread is still open lol.

0