A
Anonymous09/09/26, 02:56No.17049698
>Open problem remains unsolved for decades
>Human bean produces proof of open problem, talks to slop-GPT about it
>Slop-GPT CEO Scam Batman catches wind of the development
>Days later, frontier slop-GPT model, trained on the human proof, produces legally distinct Shakespearean type-writer monkey proof after millions and millions of dollars worth of excrement thrown at wall
"The Shadow that bred them can only mock, it cannot make: not real new things of its own." - J. R. R. Tolkien, The Return of The King
28
Replies
A
Anon09/09/26, 03:05No.17049706
>Human bean produces proof of open problem
this never happened
A
Anon09/09/26, 03:21No.17049717
If he produced the proof he would be all over your face with it. Also, the dude was doing the same kind of vibe math as openai dudes, they just had more compute.
A
Anon09/09/26, 04:11No.17049745
It's alright, they can give that other guy 1 billion dollars as compensation, what mattered was the timing.
A
Anon09/09/26, 05:16No.17049774
Is this the new cope? When GPT or Fable solve Riemman's hypothesis what will the next cope be? Just buy semiconductor companies, energy companies and construction companies and enjoy the fucking ride
A
Anon09/09/26, 05:18No.17049776
What was the proof about anyway? No one seems to talk about it I guess reading 100 pages of slop is hard but whats the point of math if we can't read it ourselves?
A
Anon09/09/26, 06:29No.17049822
I am waiting for the P vs NP..
.I am waiting.
A
Anon09/09/26, 07:40No.17049869
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.05746
>ON ENDOMORPHISMS OF AFFINE SPACES AND THE JACOBIAN PROBLEM
>Surjective (resp. surjective and non-surjective) counterexamples to Adjamagbo’s Jacobian Conjecture over each [math]k[/math] are included in dimension 2 (resp. in all dimensions at least 3)
...
>Very unfortunately and without me being aware, the in-progress version of this work dated January 14, 2025 was shared publicly at the link https://www.ihes.fr/~gabber/BGV160.pdf on January 16, 2025. My understanding is that after 18 months it became a feed of the AI models.
>To my best knowledge:
>(1) there has been no prior work before BGV160.pdf aiming to classify all étale endomorphisms of the affine spaces that have geometric degrees 3, see Section 26 of BGV160.pdf;
>(2) there has been no prior work before BGV160.pdf that used systematically [math]xy[/math], [math]1+xy[/math], and [math]\delta+xy[/math] in the construction of open embeddings, morphisms, and étale endomorphisms, including the morphism [math]A_K^2\to P_K^1[/math] defined by the rule [math](x :1 + xy)[/math];
>(3) between BGV160.pdf and the 7 pages AI paper there exists overlap of notation (such as [math]\Gamma[/math] for complements) and of intent (such as the variation of the geometric degrees, counting fibers, non-proper locus, families, the usage of [math]1+xy[/math], the computation of the normalization [math]X_e[/math] which actually plays no role in terms of the counterexamples to the Jacobian Conjecture, etc.) which are also very pertinently and systematically presented in the 37 pages pdf file;
