why isnt this the standard book for teaching

A
Anonymous09/04/26, 03:53No.17046621
Why isn't this the standard book for teaching highschool mathematics?
op image
9

Replies

A
Anon09/04/26, 04:01No.17046627
In the U.S., there are no maths instructors whoms’t can instruct it to the youthful youngsters.
A
Anon09/04/26, 04:46No.17046644
Because the math-textbook industrial complex needs to make infinite yearly new editions of books with the same content reshuffled over and over again. Old textbooks don't rake in cash. But who knows, maybe I'm just antisemetic.
A
Anon09/04/26, 05:59No.17046653
Because it doesn’t do the job.Imagine a normal average guy. Do you think after completing Lang’s Basic Mathematics he can tackle serious intro books like Spivak Calculus? The answer is no.Now imagine a bright student with aptitude in math, did contests, IMO and whatnot. Does he need Lang’s Basic Mathematics? Lol no.That’s the main issue with this book. Dumb and normal students need more help beyond this book, while the smart students don’t need it.I really doubt anyone who praised the book has actually gone throught the book, while I did. People just see “Serge Lang” and the TOC and the typesetting and assume it’s a good book.
A
Anon09/04/26, 07:21No.17046666
you learn through rote repetition so you need more exercises than are given in that book which acts more as a summary.
A
Anon09/04/26, 14:07No.17046773
That's a really nice yellow. I want to paint a wall that color. Anyone know if that has a particular name or code?
A
Anon09/04/26, 21:59No.17046989
Because its published by springer and that means it probably costs $9000 per book.
A
Anon09/05/26, 02:01No.17047048
young people are kind of fucking retarded.