A
Anonymous09/02/26, 08:45No.17045710EL NINO 2026
Redpill me on the El Nino 2026. Literally billions must die or nothingburger?

20
Replies
A
Anon09/02/26, 08:56No.17045712
In 2010 international maritime organization decreed that ships must reduce their sulfur dioxide emissions by 90% (!!!)
That target was met within a few years, despite continuing to use heavy fuel oil, the dirtiest possible fuel. How was it possible to meet the target? By installing scrubbers that spray seawater to wash the sulfur into the ocean and not discharge it into the atmosphere.The result of this regulation was that sulfur dioxide emissions fell precipitously worldwide and in the atmosphere, sulfur dioxide REFLECTS SUNLIGHT so now the globe is heating up way faster than it was before.The climate regulation plans included a PREDICTED DECREASE IN METHANE EMISSIONS from new methane regulations, to coincide with the sulfur regs. The methane was never stopped and is increasing because of more power plants coming online and increased agriculture. Countries, especially China don't seem to give a fuck about methane and its warming potential, because for the longest time the effect was mitigated by reflective aerosols in the upper atmosphere. Now the aerosols are goneEl nino is a weather pattern caused by very high temperatures in the pacific ocean, the ocean is what absorbs most of the heat of global warming, so its actually an indication of how badly the world is fucked from GW. Its going to recur year after year until the heat energy is fully dissipated as torrential hurricanes and other extreme weather. Maybe 10 more years of this shit at this rateGuess what? Now we're going to cook because we removed a cooling lever and kept pushing the warming levers. Its just simple physics, and blame shipping companies if you want to blame anyone for this.https://atmosphere.copernicus.eu/aerosols-are-so2-emissions-reductions-contributing-global-warminghttps://insideclimatenews.org/news/17072023/ship-scrubbers-water-pollution/

A
Anon09/02/26, 10:06No.17045723
From a POV of self interest, after last year's historically cold winter, we're forecast to have a mild, dry winter this year due to the Super El Nino. That'll be a nice break.
A
Anon09/02/26, 16:50No.17045844
It's el niño (ninio)
A
Anon09/02/26, 17:41No.17045876
Unironically, would a nuclear winter be good for the climate long term?
A
Anon09/02/26, 18:12No.17045885
if only we had installed a global socialist dictatorship 100 years ago this could have all been avoided :-(
A
Anon09/02/26, 19:33No.17045913
With any luck this super el nino will hit Seattle HARD, where it gets hit by something comparable to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columbus_Day_storm_of_1962 ... in 1962 there was only ~30% of today's population and the invasive plant species had not taken over all forests like they have today. It will an epic shit storm that will paralyze the region for months (perhaps years) due all the huge trees coming down everywhere. Power likely off of a very long time in large swathes of the region after this storm roars through.
A
Anon09/02/26, 19:33No.17045914
It's fucking hot, still 100+ degree days in September. The effects are the same as every heat wave we've had over the past 10 years: reduced agricultural productivity.The global south is heading into summer over the next few months... yeah, good luck to them. Hope nobody dies, thoughts and prayers, etc.
A
Anon09/04/26, 11:49No.17046731
El Nino does not exist. It does not refer to anything. It's just Blue Anon crap.
A
Anon09/04/26, 20:35No.17046949
they're saying it's strongest el nino in 1000+ years now. What will be the biggest weather disaster that results from this in the next 5 months?
A
Anon09/05/26, 01:25No.17047042
It's not a full blown disaster yet but a sign of things to come in the next decade.
A
Anon09/05/26, 01:54No.17047046
It is el Niño, NIÑO, not nino.