so like is there a reason that they teach the

Replies

A

Anon08/16/26, 12:07No.17037379

They don't know how decoherence works. It would be multiple strands of energy. There's too much noise for many worlds.

0

A

Anon08/16/26, 12:22No.17037387

Wedge product is not more general than cross product lmao these are completely different things, though somewhat related. Cross product is not an instance of the wedge product, and you don't know what you're talking about. Wedge product gives you an object of a completely different class than the original space.

1

A

Anon08/16/26, 14:24No.17037423

Geometric algebra is a cult.

2

A

Anon08/16/26, 14:44No.17037436

it's more abstract than the cross product, even if addresses the shortcomings of the cross product, is the proper foundation of determinants, and is used to extend integration to differential forms. the cross product is easy to learn and covers a huge number of practical applications correctly as long as you are careful to not do shit like reflections.

0

A

Anon08/17/26, 07:04No.17037755

The standard curriculum is a cult.

2

A

Anon08/17/26, 09:08No.17037771

It just werks.

1

A

Anon08/22/26, 00:00No.17040364

Something that wraps up four equations of Maxwell into one equation is good for me

0

A

Anon08/23/26, 22:04No.17041347

pre computer inertia, the gibbs-heavside truncation of Maxwell's into the telegraph equations using the vector algebra was simpler and yielded amicable results in their domains. They werent dealing with high dimensional vector databases, nor had weyl/dirac spinors been conceived so there wern't any of the appeal to quantum physics available

0

A

Anon08/30/26, 05:51No.17044273

why do we still teach vector spaces at all instead of modules?

1

A

Anon08/31/26, 09:12No.17044916

it's beautiful

0

A

Anon09/06/26, 03:34No.17047674

No, it's all obscenely useless in all real applications. Physishits need not reply.

0