Anon05/05/26, 01:06No.16970384
the research most of these books are built on has failed to replicate, ego depletion, social priming, most of the behavioral stuff, and the people who wrote the popular books aren't reliable either, gino studied honesty professionally and harvard just revoked her tenure for fabricating data, ariely co-authored a paper with her that got retracted for the same reason and duke kept him anyway, so the researchers and the research are both in bad shape, what actually holds up is schelling's strategy of conflict, which shows how people influence each other through commitments and expectations, if you make a credible commitment to a course of action before someone else decides, you change what they do, the models are mathematically grounded and have been validated, and elster's explaining social behavior, which is useful because it shows that for every rule about how people respond there's a counter-rule that works in the opposite direction, scarcity makes things more desirable except when it makes them look unwanted, trying to persuade someone works except when they notice you're trying to persuade them and resist, brehm documented that resistance effect in 1966 and it still replicates, the practical upshot of both books together is that you can understand the structure of a situation well enough to recognize which way things are likely to go, but you can't reliably move a specific person in a specific direction on demand, and the linguistics section of whatever reading list you find won't give you that either