A
Anonymous04/18/26, 22:52No.16960810
Biologically speaking, why is homosexuality not considered an abnormality in the world of science? The purpose of a man and a woman is for reproduction. We have special body parts that are made for that, so how is it then for two people of the same gender to be attracted together and not considered an abnormality?? It's so obvious yet the world of science simply ignores it. How is this abnormality accepted without any sort of defiance in the scientific community? Also, what's truly the percentage of people who are homosexuals (including women) only because of something wrong with them physically and not because of social trends?
53
Replies
A
Anon04/18/26, 23:48No.16960833
Science is descriptive, not prescriptive.
Nobody denies homosexuality is "abnormal" in the sense that it's relatively uncommon. But to describe any behavioral trait as good or bad is moralizing which is unscientific by definition.
A
Anon04/19/26, 00:17No.16960843
Like 99% of everything (you) have done in your entire life is "abnormal" in the sense that the human animal didn't evolve for that purpose.
You think humans evolved to make shitpost threads on internet forums?
A
Anon04/19/26, 01:08No.16960862
>The purpose of a man and a woman
Lol, that's like saying the purpose of a warm block is to heat up the cooler block next to it. There is no "purpose" in science buddy. Things just happen cause they're likely to happen, and they're constrained from things that cannot happen.
A
Anon04/19/26, 01:39No.16960869
I don't think it should be considered pathological given that I'm pretty sure it evolved among humans for a reason and is simply no longer beneficial. In hunter-gatherer societies, homosexuals would, in theory, work while largely not competing for sexual partners nor reproducing. I don't think it's a coincidence that homosexuality is related to birth order, nor that niger-congo peoples, who started farming 5kya, *seem* to be significantly gayer than other groups.
A
Anon04/19/26, 01:52No.16960874
Purple regions, the males must transition into females to become gay
A
Anon04/19/26, 02:00No.16960884
There are species like ants where the vast majority of individuals can't reproduce at all.
A
Anon04/19/26, 02:07No.16960893
Science does consider homosexuality an abnormality and a genetic error.
The lefties on reddit are not Scientists even though they claim they are. Lol.
A
Anon04/19/26, 03:22No.16960938
The gene that makes you crave benis also makes your sister crave benis. Working as intended.
A
Anon04/19/26, 05:13No.16960972
>there are women who enjoyed being cummed inside
A
Anon04/19/26, 19:11No.16961561
Purple countries:
"No fags allowed but we can't deny a little woman-on-woman action is hot."
A
Anon04/23/26, 22:48No.16963991
>Biologically speakingThe thing is that biology as a discipline is torn theoretically between making theoretical speculations about teleology or about a rational universe where things happen because of and for reasons and causes although the the empirical observation of nature and empirical experiment reveals disorder or chaos or difference on basic assumptions and in contrast to the methodology of the scientific method which often tends to short circuit teleology by making teleology atemporal such that to speak of purpose in biology is always to risk agreeing or starting a fight with an aristotelian, i’m not sure which outcome would be worst probably
A
Anon04/24/26, 03:41No.16964058
>The purpose of a man and a woman is for reproduction.
are we that stupid simple ?
A
Anon04/25/26, 04:24No.16964727
because those who control the science narrative wouldn't be pleased about it
A
Anon04/25/26, 05:51No.16964763
just because it's illegal doesn't mean it's abnormal, even though it's clearly abnormal. and making it illegal means that it's an actual problem.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FgxacX72snA
A
Anon04/25/26, 08:43No.16964841
We can objectively say homosexuality is an evolutionary dead end and a genetic defect from that standpoint, and therefore from a purely evolutionary perspective undesirable.
A
Anon04/27/26, 20:04No.16966244
Does the act of two (consenting) men having sex hurt anyone? Ask yourself this before making such a retarded rant. This isn’t even remotely a threat. What’s a threat is politicizing it and pretending degeneracy is normal. But the act of two (consenting) bodies rubbing against each other isn’t inherently threatening.I don’t even like gay people normally. I’m still pointing out how retarded homophobia is. Eighty percent of giraffes are gay.
A
Anon04/28/26, 16:47No.16966748
Because its more related to metaphysical workings
A
Anon04/29/26, 10:51No.16967216
generally speaking from a scientific standpoint, homosexuality is an abnormally but so are things like being far sighted, having adhd, liking nonsexual body parts in a sexual way, etc. but obviously, calling any of these things an 'abnormality' would cause people to flip tf out, so they're treated like normal. Any real homosexual (non groomed into it) will tell you that it is not the factory setting lol
A
Anon05/03/26, 03:23No.16969314
Sometimes you really just want to smell and taste a dick ok it’s not really all that complicated
A
Anon05/05/26, 15:10No.16970626
Men are just more exciting than women.
A
Anon05/09/26, 07:06No.16972871
fag
A
Anon05/11/26, 00:09No.16973914
Listen I have my own working theory but it's a mess of /his/lit/sci/x/ content.At the end of the day abuse will not make me change my desire for men and only men.
A
Anon05/11/26, 00:28No.16973926
>why is homosexuality not considered an abnormality in the world of science?
But it was considered an abnormality by "the world of science", until it wasn't. That should tell you everything about how useful it is to argue about the "normality"/"abnormality" of faggotry.
A
Anon05/13/26, 13:25No.16975471
How gay a species of animal is depends entirely on the animalGiraffes….