In the words of physicist Anton Zeilinger:
> [W]e always implicitly assume the freedom of the experimentalist... This fundamental assumption is essential to doing science. If this were not true, then, I suggest, it would make no sense at all to ask nature questions in an experiment, since then nature could determine what our questions are, and that could guide our questions such that we arrive at a false picture of nature.
How is this not a form of cope?
“Waaah, the observer effect isn’t le special, waaah”.
Oh grow up. Observation doesn’t predate the thing - the physics leading up to it - making it even possible to begin with. How the fuck did people suddenly forget this?
WHY do people think that free will is Lolsorandom?