Anon11/29/25, 08:35No.16859378
The general idea is, that trauma processing is non-linear - it's iterative instead. People do not and generally can not work through their problems sequentially and constructively, and instead get stuck in internal loops. Consider data-processing inequality: one cannot yield extra information with computation only.So, when people ruminate and are unable to integrate disruptive experiences, therapy both supplies a stable, recurring environment to face said problems, that usually involve challenging emotional load and defenses like dissociation. As you keep encountering the distressing memories and thought-patterns, their emotional load tends to change in tone. Memory is reconstructive, not recollective, after all.Furthermore, it doesn't hurt to have someone around to offer external input, even though therapist can't solve anyone's problems. That's still on you. But consider the DPI again - at least you get external input, usually quite observant too.Does it work? From what I hear, it might. Is it fun? No. It seems to be very frustrating and hard work. Does it yield results? Perhaps not during the sessions. Over time, it doesn't seem to make things worse, and people tend to get by. Is there a mechanism? Not in the way people might think. It's not engineering. Why is it expensive? Holding strangers' emotional burdens is exhausting.