A
Anonymous11/16/25, 07:28No.16849294What?
She can't be serious right?
nuclear fusion? nope, you don't understand bell's theorem.
cure for cancer? nope, should have studied interpretations of quantum mechanics.
Moore's law?... you guessed it
49
Replies
A
Anon11/16/25, 07:34No.16849297
at least she admits to being shit at physics
A
Anon11/16/25, 08:11No.16849321
The reason we stopped making progress in Physics in the 1970s' is because the United States government made entire areas of Math and Physics highly classified and forbid anyone from sharing it. Anybody who got too close to discovering various things has either gone quiet or died. It really started in relation to the rapid progress physics was making toward antigravity technologies the US had retrieved from crash sites (as we are led to believe).This has recently been mentioned by powerful government individuals in relation to Artificial Intelligence. You may notice a notable slowing in progress in the improvement of AI model releases from top labs. At the same time, though, they boast making generalized models that can get gold on the IMO and other top mind tests. OpenAI and Google and no doubt all the other labs have already been following this trend for at least half a year, where the divergence of quality and power between public models and internal models continues to grow exponentially. Do you think Trump gave OpenAI 500 billion dollars out of the kindness of his heart, or just purely out of a patriotic spirit? No, Trump is a businessman. If he gives an amount that high, he expects to get the golden eggs all to the government's self before it comes anywhere near public release, if it even gets that far at all.Everywhere from the atom bomb, to antigravity vehicles, to arttificial intelligence, forbidden branches of math and physics are everywhere.Look into it.
A
Anon11/16/25, 10:24No.16849448
Schizo thread. Unironically this is why /sci/ is dead. Ironic really. That we have schizos making /x/tier stories up for why physics and science have stagnated, and killing /sci/ in the process. The real answer is far more boring..
A
Anon11/16/25, 20:25No.16850004
I do not understand Bell's Theorem and I literally fuck up everything I touch.
Checkmate.
A
Anon11/17/25, 10:44No.16850470
It's curious how many people have turned to the "you guys misunderstand Bell's theorem" cope.
A
Anon11/19/25, 10:50No.16851965
>She can't be serious right?
She's a 100% serious theological determinist.>nuclear fusion?
>cure for cancer?
>Moore's law?...
Doesn't matter. It was all superdetermined already, after all. Superdetminism über alles. No one has the ability to decide which experiment to perform, or when to perform them, so scientific progress can be nothing more than (superdeterministic) stamp collecting. Only when this Unquestionable Gospel of secular Ghazi Bell and secular Grand Mufti Einstein are fully appreciated, together with complete and total destruction of the Copenhagen Infidels, will all of society's problems be solved. Superdeterministically, of course.
A
Anon11/19/25, 11:10No.16851976
Isn't that the farty german singing lady?
A
Anon11/30/25, 00:56No.16859810
Sabine is very gullible. She was fooled by LK-99 for a while, and now she's fully on board with the "mystery objects in geostationary orbit before sputnik" junk science paper that's been doing the rounds.