nice guy but damn his photos suck

A
Anonymous09/05/26, 01:55No.4526139
nice guy but damn his photos suck
op image
34

Replies

A
Anon09/05/26, 02:34No.4526143
He seems extremely pretentious to me, but he is a New Yorker 'artist' so what can I really expect.
A
Anon09/05/26, 14:19No.4526198
His appeal isn't the photos its the whole sleazy nyc con man aesthetic, like James Woods. zoomers love that shit. He would be better off doing a reality show.
A
Anon09/06/26, 03:24No.4526287
No street photographer is good. Period. It's all genuine garbage.
A
Anon09/06/26, 03:58No.4526289
and yet millions of people have seen them and only a handful of idiots on 4chan have seen yours, if you even have had the balls to post in the RPT which I doubt. Curious : )
A
Anon09/06/26, 04:51No.4526294
OI
Reply image .png
A
Anon09/06/26, 19:46No.4526433
All these people are gay for pay, right?
A
Anon09/12/26, 18:07No.4527450
>"one of my favourite photos I've ever taken"
Reply image .png
A
Anon09/17/26, 13:06No.4528383
A
Anon09/23/26, 15:11No.4529984
Dude's photography sucks but we should learn one thing from him: image matters in art. The way you carry yourself is also important. One can become a double edged sword if the work and image both are good.Maybe I should start acting a certain to catch some attention.Here's a question I want to ask /p/:Is it good to be authentic no fucks given kinda photographer or is it good to build an image/personality through artifice(art is artifice so why not practice this irl too)?I mean think about rockstars, they all act a certain way. Nobody would take a fat as fuck dude to be a rockstar. So why we as photographers should shy away from creating/presenting an image that is similar to our work? Isn't it good marketing strategy too?
A
Anon09/23/26, 17:42No.4530025
He’s sexy.