A
Anonymous01/05/26, 03:30No.4492256
Can we agree that almost any modern digital camera takes "good" photos (with the obvious exception of Micro 4/3)?
24
Replies
A
Anon01/05/26, 03:32No.4492259
Nope. Sadly digital will always be catching up to and never quite reaching what film produces image quality-wise.
A
Anon01/05/26, 03:35No.4492260
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kekAUeoSo8U
A
Anon01/05/26, 04:33No.4492267
The Canon 5D mkii was the perfect balance between film-like attractive photos and modern convenience to use. Before the 5D mkii the image quality was poor and the cameras were slow and difficult to use. After the 5D mkii they started producing soulless spec-sheet focused sterile images that require significant editing to look aesthetic.
A
Anon01/05/26, 07:12No.4492282
Camera is just a tool. A good tool gives utility which a shitty tool does not have.
It's the camera user who takes the good and bad photographs. One who can not take a good photo of a slow or static subject in good light with a shitty camera likely can not do it with a good camera.(A holiday snap from 2002)
A
Anon01/13/26, 18:11No.4493646
>lust-provoking image
>time-wasting question