Anon12/22/25, 15:27No.4489722
From top level down>Settings in-camera
Use 4 folders. 3 for normal use and 1 for tests/ignorable photos. Normally devided either by different days of shooting or regular intervals at a long event
>Import RAW files to NAS pool1 (and ooc jpegs/video if applicable)
- YYYY
- MM-DD (of import) [event name/theme name if applicable]
- FOLDER1/FOLDER2/FOLDER3 from in-camera structure
- Files have metadata that show when file was created aka the day it was taken if it is different to the MM-DD folder date
>Cull here, import good RAWs to local storage Working Folder
>Rsync local storage RAWs to seperate NAS pool2 for backups
>Return to local storage working folder
>Edit & Save JPEGs from RAW
>Edited JPEGs go into same folder as backed up RAWs on NAS pool2
- YYYY
- [Landscape | Astro | Urban (etc.)]
- MM-DD
>burn DVD-R Archival Grade (Master) with the new backed up RAWs/Edited JPEGs whenever I can fill one for the purpose of archiving or every 3 months.Once I got in the flow it's pretty seemless. I have some days where I shoot several thousand photos, and some where I shoot ten. The structure is logical and predictable with only the edited JPEGs going into a folder system that is subjective (themes instead of dates etc.)
>Having an ever growing list of collections seems like a problem waiting to happen
I would always fall back to the more predicable YYYY-MM-DD format. Of course this only helps you pinpoint when the photo was imported/created and nothing else, but a bit of manual perusing is not particularly perilious.
>The only thing I've seen online that might be a good idea is maybe grouping my collections by location
If you're appending GPS info to your photos, then sure. Otherwise I see this as more of a hinderance than a benefit.I also organise film negs but my volume is so low that I just mark each binder sheet with the date of completion and a unique number that I also put into my digitized folder so I know which is which.