A
Anonymous12/01/25, 04:58No.4485653/Gear/ Containment
>perfect colors right the first time edition
>>4484029 [/p/thread/4484029#p4484029]
172
Replies
A
Anon12/01/25, 05:04No.4485655
what exactly is this supposed to be showcasing?
Half these photos look like wormy shit either RAW or edited.
A
Anon12/01/25, 05:33No.4485658
What is the model of the camera in this advertisement? Is the x-half a good camera to get into Fuji? Will the colors be just as good as the ones from the camera in this advertisement?
A
Anon12/01/25, 05:49No.4485660
But all of the colors look like shit? Why pay extra, give up image quality, build quality, and working autofocus, just to have mid tier contrast/saturation-boosted lightroom profiles baked into the cameraFfs just use your phone. These photos look exactly like iPhone photos with filters enabled. No discernible difference at all.
A
Anon12/01/25, 11:30No.4485689
>raw == edited
or am i color blind
A
Anon12/01/25, 11:31No.4485690
>RAW/Edited
What did he mean by this? A RAW file doesn't even have colors
A
Anon12/01/25, 11:56No.4485692
Is it true that Fuji kit lenses are better than the competition?
A
Anon12/01/25, 14:51No.4485712
Editing raws is easier and faster than shooting jpeg and an iPhone outperforms the fujifilm xe5 and x100viIf you disagree you’re too dumb to use a computer. Simple as.
A
Anon12/01/25, 15:46No.4485724
is this real? I hate editing. should I get a tranny worm camera?
A
Anon12/01/25, 15:46No.4485725
so tuff
A
Anon12/01/25, 17:26No.4485745
Can someone explain worms to me
A
Anon12/01/25, 18:37No.4485764
>A canon R8 with IS lenses has better everything than a fuji xt5
KEK
A
Anon12/01/25, 18:52No.4485774
fujifilms price/performance isnt just inexcusablefujifilms performance period is inexcusable. under no conditions should a properly exposed photo from an ILC look as bad as one from an iphone. ever. if an x100vi or xe5 can not turn its sensor data into a jpeg as well as an iphone its not a good product.
A
Anon12/01/25, 19:02No.4485778
Does Canon have anything that isn’t a big chunk?
Realistically, I do this as a hobby and prefer a smaller camera. I’d buy an m240, but $3k for a body and a 50mm prime is too much for a hobby.
I know I should just get an a7c, but I just don’t vibe with it, and the gigantic hyper-corrected lenses defeat the purpose of a compact body. Same issue I have with the Nikon Z mount, desu
A
Anon12/01/25, 19:23No.4485783
Looks like the smartphone filters you used to get on VSCO back in 2016.
A
Anon12/01/25, 21:52No.4485819
Why does the mere mention of Fujifilm cause such a visceral reaction in /gear/fags?
>inb4 the same sperg out giving me (You)s
A
Anon12/02/25, 00:59No.4485833
I’ve looked over probably hundreds of sample GFX produced images and they look remarkable, as good as anything I’ve seen apart from Hasselblad.Images from the GF 110mm f/2 lens for example are stunning.I have no idea what you people are on about.
A
Anon12/02/25, 01:06No.4485834
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA
A
Anon12/02/25, 02:46No.4485845
>casually gives you a mental breakdown
A
Anon12/02/25, 04:30No.4485875
>Fuji autofocus is GOOD. See, AF-S hit the building corner every time! SHOW ME WHERE IN RPT SOMEONE SHOT SOMETHING OTHER THAN A BUILDING CO-
>canon autofocus on the fucking r50: birds in flight, no problem, athletes running towards the camera, kids, cats, dogs, nails it every time
such is the cope of people who overspent by thousands on phone tier jpegs and raws that take three times longer to load
A
Anon12/02/25, 04:33No.4485877
>R50 sample gallery
wow look at that detail
A
Anon12/02/25, 07:19No.4485911
Found a Canon 5D Mark IV in mint shape for $700 USD locally, worth jumping ship from a Pentax K1 Mark II? Not really happy with the AF performance and lens selection (kinda shit unless I want lenses from <1990, all screw drive stuff and the "good lenses" are 2-3x Canon equivalents)
A
Anon12/02/25, 14:08No.4485955
>f/8.0
Barely enough
>1/1000
Why? Waves would be just as good with a slower shutter
>ISO 400
Why?
>Overexposing one stop + no histogram
Why if you have no histogram?Do fujiworms really?
A
Anon12/02/25, 14:23No.4485961
>Sony a7V specs
>Same 33MP
>Same EVF
>New tilting screen
>More 'AI powered features'
>$2899
What went wrong?
A
Anon12/02/25, 14:40No.4485963
Looking at 135mm lenses for my old SLR. There are three versions available: f2.8, f3.5, and f4.5. What should be my deciding factor between these three options? How much I'm shooting at night? Sharpness at long distances?
A
Anon12/02/25, 15:07No.4485972
snoysisters... how do we recover from this...
A
Anon12/02/25, 15:39No.4485977
https://www.ebay.com/itm/336198754169Someone buy this lot of ewaste before I doCanon 5D Classic w/Battery Grip, 28-135mm USM IS Lens, Manfrotto 3221WN Tripod, and EOS RT 35mm Film Body for $258 + taxI'm trying to buy a Pentax KS2 w/18-50mm Kit Lens + 50mm f2 Prime for $150 locally instead.
A
Anon12/02/25, 16:37No.4485988
So when are we gonna see some more global shutter cameras? Doesn't seem to be much going on on that front.
A
Anon12/02/25, 22:28No.4486019
I’ve been shooting and developing film for a few years since I had a nice place near home to develop and scan. Moved away and now I’m kinda stuck with digital. Problem isHave a 60d with some basic lenses (50mm 1.8, 24mm 2.8, 70-300 kit zoom) and it’s really not inspiring me to shoot digital since the autofocus is ass and its low light performance is shit coming from film.Should I just sell my digital setup and start over or buy a 18-55 2.8 and hope the glass saves me? Right now my iPhone blows it out of the water.Pic because I love Canon color SOOC.
A
Anon12/02/25, 23:59No.4486034
So the A7V sucks. What should anyone actually buy? A Z8?
A
Anon12/03/25, 03:37No.4486061
If I were to get a camera for the sole purpose of taking pictures of paintings; should I try to get as many megapixels as possible or should I get something like a canon powershot g10 for the ccd sensor? I used to come here like 5-10 years ago and /p/ used to swear by the g10.
>Or they were memeing.
Are there cameras that have perfect color accuracy?
A
Anon12/03/25, 04:45No.4486079
Is the Tamron 25-200 OK for close up shots? Technically it should have 0.5x magnification but I think that's only at 25mm (which means you have to be 2cm from your subject). Whats the mag ratio at say 100mm?Otherwise I might just pick up the 90mm Tamron 2.8 Macro or the Laowa 180mm f4.5.But if I can get decently close with a zoom, that'd be pretty neat too.