A
Anonymous10/13/25, 01:05No.1447130Republicans Start Collecting Gun Registry
The Pam Bondi Justice Department continues its anti-Second Amendment engagements, this time instructing a court to deny universal relief to all gun owners and, for perhaps the first time ever, asking a court to force a plaintiff to hand over its private membership list.
The complaint in Reese v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, originated in 2020 when gun rights groups and individual plaintiffs challenged Louisiana’s prohibition on handgun purchases for adults under 21. In January of this year, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit overturned a previous District Court ruling and sent the case back down for review, as we reported.
In that process, the ATF, under the Department of Justice, issued a 16-page brief to the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana in anticipation of the revised ruling, and as requested by the court. In this brief, the ATF/DOJ made two main arguments attempting to sway the court’s decision:
No universal relief should be entered.
The court’s judgment should be limited to the three individual plaintiffs and to any identified and verified member of the organizational plaintiffs who was a member when the suit was filed.
>https://www.news2a.com/national/bondi-doj-denies-universal-relief-and-requests-gun-rights-group-private-membership-list/
49
Replies
A
Anon10/13/25, 01:06No.1447131
(Cont)
In essence, the ATF was trying to keep the judgment – and the relief it provided – as narrow as possible and prevent it from being applied to gun owners broadly declaring, “…to the extent that Plaintiffs might request this Court to enter declaratory or injunctive relief universal in scope, such a request would be inappropriate.”This posture is blatantly hostile to gun owners, but not nearly as egregious as the ATF’s next request, which is to turn over membership lists of the gun rights groups listed on the complaint (which include Firearms Policy Coalition Inc., Second Amendment Foundation, and Louisiana Shooting Association):In accordance with the specificity requirements of Rule 65(d), Defendants’ proposed judgment limits its scope to members of the organizational plaintiffs who have been identified and verified to Defendants during this case. Defendants cannot comply with a judgment if they do not know to whom the judgment applies.Surprisingly, the District Court complied with the request, which amounts to creating a limited type of gun registry (which is illegal), instructing in its two-page order on October 7 that:Within twenty-one (21) days of issuance of this Judgment, those Plaintiffs identified at paragraph 2(b) shall provide to Defendants a verified list of their members as of November 6, 2020.
A
Anon10/13/25, 01:17No.1447134
You voted for this, gun schizo of /news/
A
Anon10/13/25, 01:41No.1447138
1) That's not what is happening at all. Op is a jeet misrepresenting the story
2) Democrats have such bad TDS that they are against gun laws just to oppose Trump
A
Anon10/13/25, 01:48No.1447140
First they came for the antifa guns, then they came for the white nat guns. come on my fellow far right Wing ammosexual Americans, you may be bigot scum but we all must fight fascism together , we are all ANTIFA
A
Anon10/13/25, 02:05No.1447144
nobody, absolutely nobody, could have seen this coming after the kirk shooting
can't wait for the mental gymnastics about how it's not actually gun control
A
Anon10/13/25, 02:59No.1447168
>trannies
But enough about 1447166's sexual obsession
A
Anon10/13/25, 03:09No.1447179
>1447166's sexual obsession
1447170
QED
A
Anon10/13/25, 03:26No.1447183
First, the Trump admin is exceptionally pro-2A. The DOJ's human rights division (under Harmeet Dillon) now handles gun cases and has sued a number of states to protect the 2A.Second, in relation to this case, the DOJ is asking for a list of members (ironically) to protect the 2A. The DOJ is saying that if they win or lose it should only apply to the members of those groups and not to all Americans in general. This is important as random Americans will still have standing to sue in the future regardless of what happens here.Representing things like this is very grifty for GOA.
A
Anon10/13/25, 03:43No.1447189
Reagan was the first governor to do this.
A
Anon10/13/25, 04:36No.1447201
>Trump
Trump = totalitarian
Hitler = totalitarian
Bolsheviks = anti-Hitler
Antifa = anti-fascist
Why shouldn't the next Democrat administration let good laws - brought into being by Trump - go to waste in exacting revenge against pro-Trumpists? Can't take a bit of 'Fashing Up', they never had the right to dish it out to those not exactly like them in the first place
>US military in WWII
>Bolsheviks just a few blocks away from that in a hole in the ground that took 7.65mm Aspirin thus the Final Solution to the Fascist Question
It wasn't just the former who said 'The Only Good Nazi Is A Dead Nazi'
A
Anon10/13/25, 05:16No.1447210
This is sort of a cool episode of
>I don't care at all and I want this to happen, but you care so you should vote for my team so it totally happens
Anyway, the governfuck will continue to boil us frogs until it gets what it wants. It's not like it matters who you vote for.
A
Anon10/13/25, 08:07No.1447214
Told you, MAGA. You didn't listen.
So what's the cope going to be this time?
A
Anon10/13/25, 13:24No.1447230
Oh look, another thread full of lying jeets shills. You will never ban guns and white males will shoot your third world asses when you start throwing shit in public. Cope and seethe, eternally.
A
Anon10/13/25, 15:56No.1447254
good so the democrats should be happy now right? right?!! soon the only ones with access to guns will be law enforcement like ice. I hope you'll enjoy your rioting when that happens.
I'm fine with no guns if it means only the spooky boogeyman who supposedly according to leftists want to execute people on the spot judge dredge style have them.
A
Anon10/13/25, 18:05No.1447278
1447264
>maga whining
ftfy
>does the judge execute people yes
No. Mega-City One Judges mainly send perps - except those that are threats to citizens/Justice Department - to the Iso-Cubes.
>like i care
>screech about it
But you replied, so you tell me.
A
Anon10/15/25, 08:57No.1447859
In a certain comic scenario, that which resulted in the setting of such. Mega-City One on the east coast. Mega-City Two on the west coast. Texas City in the south. In between such: an irradiated wasteland inhabited by only a few groups of lawless criminals, mutants etc: the Cursed Earth. All because of WWIII - which resulted in those three areas left run by the Judge System - started by a narcissistic megalomaniac of a US president who ran his administration like a fascistic tyrant.
The scenario that is Judge Dredd in the comic 2000 AD predicted Trump