A
Anonymous10/08/25, 09:28No.1445906Trump considers massive bailout of at least $10 billion for American farmers hurt by his trade war
https://www.cnn.com/2025/10/05/business/farmer-bailout-trump-tariffs
Washington — American farmers are having a tough year, in no small part because of President Donald Trump’s trade war. Now, the White House is gearing up to extend them a multi-billion-dollar bailout, sources tell CNN.
Surging costs and foreign retaliation from tariffs have hurt the US agriculture industry — as have immigration-related labor shortages and plummeting commodity prices. Farm production expenses are estimated to reach $467.4 billion in 2025, according to the Agriculture Department, up $12 billion from last year.
Farm bankruptcies rose in the first half of the year to the highest level since 2021, according to US courts data.
Trump’s policies have exacerbated those woes, from the deportation of the industry’s key migrant workforce to renewed trade tensions between the United States and China. And for traditional American crops, such as soybeans, the situation has grown particularly precarious.
“There’s no doubt that the farm economy is in a significant challenge right now, especially our row croppers,” Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins told reporters Tuesday. “So not just soybeans, although I think they’re probably the top of the list, but corn, wheat, sorghum, cotton, et cetera.”
Indeed, the US soybean industry has become the poster child of the farm economy’s plight in the first year of Trump’s second term. The president recognizes these problems, White House officials tells CNN, and has increased pressure on his administration to address them urgently.
96
Replies
A
Anon10/08/25, 09:29No.1445907
Over the past few weeks, the White House has held a series of interagency meetings with the Departments of Agriculture and Treasury as they attempt to finalize a relief package for US farmers, the sources said. Discussions over the best way to aid the agriculture industry are ongoing, the officials said, but they have zeroed in on two options. The Wall Street Journal first reported the discussions.“There are a lot of levers we can use to help ease the pain they are feeling,” one of the officials told CNN. One idea, floated publicly by Trump as recently as Wednesday, is to give farmers a percentage of the income the United States is receiving from the administration’s tariffs on goods being imported into the country.“We’ve made so much money on Tariffs, that we are going to take a small portion of that money, and help our Farmers. I WILL NEVER LET OUR FARMERS DOWN!” Trump wrote on social media this week. The other is tapping into a “slush fund,” as the officials described it, at the Department of Agriculture.The Trump administration also dipped into the fund, known as Emergency Commodity Assistance Program (ECAP), in March to similarly provide assistance to farmers. USDA at the time issued $10 billion in direct payments to eligible agricultural producers of eligible commodities for the 2024 crop year.The administration has also discussed implementing a combination of the two, depending on where they can most quickly pull the funds from, one White House official said. The current range of aid they are looking to offer ranges from $10 billion to $14 billion.“The final figure will depend on how much farmers need and the amount of tariff revenue coming in,” the official told CNN.
A
Anon10/08/25, 09:30No.1445908
Trump himself as privately been applying pressure on his team to ensure that American farmers, many of whom the Trump administration credit for helping the president win the November 2024 election, are protected. But the other reason they are making the agriculture industry such a priority, officials say, is because the Trump administration views protecting farmers as a national security issue.“We need to grow our own food. We can’t rely on imports from other countries, that poses a problem for national security. And right now, the government is subsidizing a lot of that process,” one Trump administration official argued.US soybean industry in crisisAn issue complicating the Trump administration’s goals revolve around soybeans — America’s largest agricultural export, valued at more than $24 billion in 2024, according to USDA data.Last year, about half of those exports went to China, but since May, that’s dropped down to zero as a result of an effective embargo China has placed on US soybeans in retaliation for Trump’s tariffs on the country. China has implemented 20% tariffs on US soybeans, making the crop from other countries significantly more attractive.That couldn’t come at worse time for soybean farmers, with the harvest season in full swing and some farms reporting strong yields. And their luck might not change anytime soon, with Beijing ramping up its reliance on South America — inadvertently aided the US Treasury’s financial lifeline provided to Argentina in recent weeks.
A
Anon10/08/25, 09:31No.1445909
Last week, the Trump administration said it would arrange a $20 billion lifeline to Argentina’s central bank, which would exchange US dollars for pesos to help stabilize Argentina’s financial market. Argentina also temporarily scrapped export taxes on grains to help stabilize the peso, but China didn’t waste any time.Beijing purchased “at least 10 cargoes of Argentine soybeans,” according to a report from Reuters. Brazil has also helped meet China’s demand for soybeans, with both countries announcing a pact in July to deepen agricultural trade ties.As a result, America’s hobbled soybean industry is calling on the Trump administration to finish its trade negotiations with China.“US soybean farmers have been clear for months: the administration needs to secure a trade deal with China. China is the world’s largest soybean customer and typically our top export market,” American Soybean Association President Caleb Ragland said last week in a statement.Pressure on TrumpMany farmers say time is of the essence as they start to bring in this year’s crop.“We’re always hopeful that those negotiations are moving forward, but yet with harvest here, patience may be running thin,” one Indiana farmer told CNN, describing the industry’s many challenges, which also include the deportation of key workers.
A
Anon10/08/25, 09:32No.1445910
Trump has heard the calls for action.On Wednesday, Trump blamed China for the pain soybean farmers are facing, arguing Beijing is refusing to buy soybeans for negotiating purposes amid the two countries’ tariff dispute. He added that he plans to make soybeans “a major topic of discussion” when he meets face-to-face with China’s President Xi Jinping in South Korea next month.Part of the reason Trump has given the issue so much attention, White House officials say, is because Rollins has forced the issue with not only the president, but also one of his closest advisers: Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent.On Tuesday, a photo of Bessent’s phone captured by the Associated Press went viral, showing a text from a contact named “BR,” presumed to be Rollins. Her messages illustrated panic within the Trump administration over the soybean industry’s woes, which worsened over the Argentina ordeal.During this “time of uncertainty” for farmers and ranchers, Rollins said that she is in “constant communication” with the White House and partners across the government. Rollins also called Trump’s idea of temporarily giving tariff revenue to farmers “a very elegant solution.”“To this moment of uncertainty, the ability to offset any payments to the farmers through potential tariff revenue is really where the president wants us to head, and that’s what we’re looking at,” she added.
A
Anon10/08/25, 09:56No.1445911
How very efficient.
A
Anon10/08/25, 10:03No.1445912
'Should any political party attempt to abolish social security, unemployment insurance, and eliminate labor laws and farm programs, you would not hear of that party again in our political history'
The above is a quote by someone who thought befire he spoke. Certainly before he acted.
Considering the letter after the particular US president who said that, was he wrong, Trumpo?
A
Anon10/08/25, 12:53No.1445914
>Farm production expenses are estimated to reach $467.4 billion in 2025, according to the Agriculture Department, up $12 billion from last year.
Wait so he's not even really bailing most of them out with this?
A
Anon10/08/25, 14:54No.1445948
Reminder that liberals believe the government should subsidize everything except the food supply. Starvation is one of their favorite things about communism. You can spend 200 million on gay muppets in the middle east, but no money can go to keeping the good supply stable
A
Anon10/08/25, 17:16No.1446000
>hm yeah let’s just print 10 billion dollars
>inflation spikes
>farmers and everyone else more in debt
>problem not solved
A
Anon10/08/25, 18:28No.1446023
The subsidized queens get more welfare? Color me shocked.
A
Anon10/08/25, 21:47No.1446075
We don't need to be feeding the Chinese, we need to be starving them. There are more than enough Chinks on the planet by an order of magnitude, the last thing we need to be doing is making sure they have enough food to keep breeding.
A
Anon10/10/25, 02:56No.1446335
1446333
>This is just a short list of disasters Democrats were using to campaign on
5/5 special elections say you're a moron
A
Anon10/10/25, 03:23No.1446355
CNN never heard of an H-2A visa and just assumed some stuff from the looks of it.
Perhaps no one wants to come to this jewish led hellhole anymore and be a part of neo liberal capitalist bullshit.
A
Anon10/11/25, 22:21No.1446945
Aren't most of the farms affected by this very large scale?
A
Anon10/15/25, 04:05No.1447792
While farmers are failing and grocery prices keep rising there is some good news so do not fret... the good news is that human resources are cheap. Get on the train car, slave.
A
Anon10/15/25, 04:07No.1447793
>more inflation
A
Anon10/15/25, 05:23No.1447822
10 billion isn't much when you factor in Republicans skimming the till. 1% might reach the 99%. Kinda obvious at this point.