A
Anonymous07/30/26, 05:12No.25433239
>there are people on this board, right now, that unironically think that James’ is correct

18
Replies
A
Anon07/30/26, 05:20No.25433248
Who cares English has no rules like a real language
A
Anon07/30/26, 05:24No.25433252
Isn’t an apostrophe after S only for the plural of something that already ends with S? But then how would you format a possessive of a plural of something that already ends with S?
A
Anon07/30/26, 06:13No.25433297
First is how you write it, second is how you say it.
A
Anon07/30/26, 06:15No.25433302
>of James

A
Anon07/30/26, 08:36No.25433502
.

A
Anon07/30/26, 09:14No.25433539
I use both while doing transcription. If you sound them out, sometimes people pronounce it one way or the other.
A
Anon07/30/26, 10:44No.25433608
I do. It is more aesthetic. Problem?

A
Anon07/30/26, 11:42No.25433670
>James'
It is correct, you fucking dolt.
A
Anon07/30/26, 18:28No.25434249
Jame's

A
Anon07/30/26, 18:41No.25434277
Finnegans's' Wake
A
Anon07/30/26, 18:49No.25434295
It's one of those stylistic things that is sort of in-between. James's was more common not that long ago, but James' is fairly common too.
A
Anon07/30/26, 18:55No.25434304
I spell and pronounce James' because I don't want to sound like a braindamaged retard