is there any other author that acknowledges the

Replies

A

Anon07/28/26, 10:13No.25428649

>the weakness of liberalism of atomising people it is its strength

2

A

Anon07/28/26, 10:26No.25428660

Alain de Benoist. He also isn't a massive faggot like MacIntyre

2

A

Anon07/28/26, 10:38No.25428673

what do you mean by 'right wing'?

0

A

Anon07/28/26, 10:55No.25428689

>and offer solutions without being a right wing or fascist?That's simply not possible as far as I can tell. You'll have to kill the Liberal to stop him, and the Left can't kill the Liberal because the Left needs the Liberal to pave the ground for Socialism. Waiting for a socialism that never comes has hamstrung the Leftist and left him unable to respond to the Liberal in a decisive way.

1

A

Anon07/28/26, 11:08No.25428711

deleuze and guattari use the terms 'decoding' and 'deterritorialisation' to refer to social atomisation and the breakdown of stable systems of meaning. but to them this isn't necessarily bad. it has made us aware of our power to infinitely reshape the world. it's bad only because the logic doing the reshaping is the logic of capital. their project is about seizing the power capital has unlocked and putting it in the service of desire, which for them is always social, collective desire. one danger in right wing thought is that it 'reterritorialises' us onto artificial recreations of those past collective forms that are compatible with and useful to capital, cutting us off from our power to explore desire and create new forms, and leaving the axioms of capital unchallenged. this is the jordan peterson move, pretending your miserable life is a mythic struggle against chaos, when the real determinants of your life lie in the inhuman world of global markets.

1

A

Anon07/28/26, 13:51No.25428951

Mystical human connections and social bonds, many years ago in a far far away land humans lived in perfect harmony until the evil liberalism

0

A

Anon07/28/26, 14:40No.25429056

Nope. No one. In fact you asking this actually killed any chance of there being anything else.

0

A

Anon07/28/26, 16:07No.25429213

>without being a [sic] right wing The "right wing" as it exists in today's politics still comes out of Illuminism and is inherently liberal. And this is not a matter of "the republicans of today are just the democrats of 50 years ago". No, since the inception of the left-right wing dichotomy, they were both flavors of the same type of enlightenment liberalism. >or fascist Stop misusing that word. You can't fascism without corporatism. Any "fascism" lacking that is just totalitarianism.Anyway, read any pro-monarchy book, what the fuck do I know

1

A

Anon07/28/26, 17:04No.25429339

Yes, Charles Taylor (like in his article literally called "Atomism"). Probably also Sandel and Walzer but I haven't read them. These guys plus MacIntyre were lumped together as a movement called "communitarianism."Marx too, actually, in the 1844 manuscripts. Engels also briefly criticizes the atomism in Socialism Utopian and Scientific (which is an excerpt from Anti-Duhring). It's worth looking at the 1844 stuff.Finally, I think it's worth it to check out what Martin Buber has to say about this stuff too.

2

A

Anon07/29/26, 08:20No.25431345

Most great authors have been chuds.

0

A

Anon07/29/26, 10:11No.25431433

Christopher Lasch, though that's hard to see sometimes given the positive attention he gets from certain quarters of the Right who forget he's a non-Marxist socialist.

1

A

Anon07/29/26, 10:55No.25431460

Would you like to know a secret?All the power of Liberalism is bound up in the Entity of the United States of America. Everything you hate about the Modern West derives its support in a magical, occult way from the USA, and from its Constitution and Declaration.To break Liberalism's hold on the West, simply destroy the totem. Shatter the idol.In other words: kill the United States.

1

A

Anon07/29/26, 11:42No.25431521

holy kek you just asked if your stupid right wing ideology has any non-right winger supportersfuck off

0

A

Anon07/29/26, 12:19No.25431553

Arendt and Leo Strauss

0

A

Anon07/29/26, 12:40No.25431567

No, and that says a lot.

0

A

Anon07/29/26, 14:45No.25431740

government always destroys social bonds to increase it's own power

0

A

Anon07/29/26, 16:11No.25431863

You speak as if fascists authors on this subject are extremely common.

0