excluding evola is this really the only

A
Anonymous07/22/26, 22:43No.25417620
(excluding Evola) Is this really the only introductory work to magic in theory written by someone who wasn't an hedon, """Academic""", hyperphilosemite or simply grifter?
op image
123

Replies

A
Anon07/22/26, 22:55No.25417639
What are Hitlers contributions to this, and did this have anything to do with his rise to power?
A
Anon07/22/26, 22:56No.25417643
The stuff in this book is just made up. It isn't actually a study into historic magical practices as they actually existed.
A
Anon07/22/26, 23:29No.25417714
>replying to tripfags, ever
Reply image .jpg
A
Anon07/23/26, 00:37No.25417824
Try the attached. I've heard good things about The Western Esoteric Traditions: A Historical Introduction, but my copy hasn't arrived yet. The hannegraaf one is a touch polticial for my tastes but other than that, it's fine. Lots of information in both around the history, background and rough shape of their practices. Meditations on the Tarot, Chapter 1, is worth a read and a little closer to actual 'magic' if more a guide on the why and a touch of how.If you're looking for a prescriptive and operational manual, can't help you.
Reply image .jpg
A
Anon07/23/26, 03:58No.25418135
do you guys actually practice the magic in these books, or are you all just reading this stuff from an academic perspective?
Reply image .jpg
A
Anon07/23/26, 04:29No.25418159
You'd legitimately be better served by reading picrel first.
Reply image .jpg
A
Anon07/23/26, 05:42No.25418228
can't you use magic to find such works though? your 6th sense intuition should be able to help you by now
A
Anon07/23/26, 06:32No.25418269
Legit question does anybody know of any books on LSD and how it decalcifies your pineal gland?
A
Anon07/23/26, 06:56No.25418299
Just read Alan and Steve Moore's The Moon and Serpent Bumper Book of Magic, it's great for that purpose and serves as an excellent introduction to the framework, methodology and history of magic, esoteric, mystic, occult and alchemical thought written by two staunch magicians who have plenty of mileage in the field.
A
Anon07/23/26, 09:53No.25418423
>excluding Evola Evola doesn't even write about magic as anyone understands it, it's basically just false advertising. He defines magic as "the science of the self" and the rest of the book is just dogshit philosophy takes but without using the word philosophy or names of philisophers, out of fear the reader might turn to minds that actually know something. Any scholarly dive into the the occult will inevitably tell you it's all bullshit because you can just try it and it doesn't work. The only people that will tell you it works are the "don't try to understand it, feel it" types who will withhold information from you for years at a time until you've invested a big chunk of your life into learning "the secrets" and from then on you're incentivsed to find the next sucker, which obviously doesn't work in book format.
A
Anon07/24/26, 11:38No.25420455
>introductory work to magic Kieckhefer R. - Forbidden Rites. A Necromancer's Manual of the Fifteenth Century (1998) If you dislike the academic's opinions, skip to the 15th-century text itself (albeit, it's in latin)Attrell D., Porreca D. - Picatrix. A Medieval Treatise on Astral Magic (2022) If you dislike the academic's opinions, ignore the introduction, dive straight to the text.Klaassen F.F. (ed.) - Making Magic in Elizabethan England. Two Early Modern Vernacular Books of Magic (2022) Same shit.Agrippa H.C. - Three Books of Occult Philosophy (2009) Ignore Donald Tyson's commentaries, dive straight to the text.
A
Anon07/25/26, 01:28No.25421606
Didn’t know a card game had such a long history.
A
Anon07/25/26, 07:35No.25421956
good onesI may complete the palette with a few narrative onesThe Golden Ass (Apuleius) Comte de Gabalis (Henri de Montfaucon de Villars) The Devil in Love (Jacques Cazotte) The Night Land by (William Hope Hodgson) The Golem (Gustav Meyrink) Through the Gates of the Silver Key (H. P. Lovecraft & E. Hoffmann Price) The Secret of Secrets (Dan Brown)
Reply image .jpg
A
Anon07/25/26, 12:03No.25422155
I can’t stand these pretentious retard discord stoners. They all like Schelling too and think Hegel was a neoplatonic mystic. Genuinely retarded human beings.
Reply image .png
A
Anon07/25/26, 14:20No.25422324
Why is everyone on 4chan so mean? Why can't you all just be nice?
A
Anon07/25/26, 14:46No.25422358
lol I still remember when some fag was shilling this book every day a coupla years back.
A
Anon07/25/26, 15:21No.25422416
I think it's the secular humanist type that are most scared of the 'supernatural' (really just nature not yet understood [this is hegel btw, reason outruns understanding, which i'm sure you know]) because it would absolutely crush their worldview and give them a full blown panic attack with the possibility of long term, if not permanent, psychosis.
A
Anon07/25/26, 15:25No.25422420
Dionysus and Eris sitting in a tree...
A
Anon07/25/26, 22:18No.25423151
>good thread >decent recommendations >civil discussion on each >courteous resolution of disagreements >philosophy faggots arrive >llm posts and mindless screeching retardationI wish you'd all go back to the humanities board.
A
Anon07/25/26, 23:25No.25423282
Imma boudda get high as fuck and wander round dis city thinkin on kant an shit an jews no goo you feel me hegel marx nigga spinoza lmao
Reply image .jpg
A
Anon07/27/26, 03:31No.25425810
Magic..
A
Anon07/27/26, 03:40No.25425826
if anything, the book introduces you other interesting obscure authors
A
Anon07/27/26, 04:17No.25425875
When I meaning "hyper-philosemite" in regards to magic in theory and practice, I am specifically making the implication of the Acephale secret academic society of Bataille. They made it an implicate belief that any form of "Antisemitism" (and they use this word as liberally as possible) is a manifestion of fascism/oppression itself against gnosis, completely disregarding that Jews, and I am meaning to say as well that most Jews are Zionists, ARE the very fascists and oppressors they deem to hate. This is hypersemetism, a complete denial of ideological & spiritual facts at hand. I don't really mind Qhabbalah as it isn't just an magical school of thoughts among many, but an intricate metaphysic that's more than esotericism, it is also the foundations of many beliefs today. Not sure if anon would agree, but I don't think there are people today who are still stupid enough to believe that Jews cannot do any wrong out of pure contrarianism.
Reply image .jpg
A
Anon07/28/26, 08:43No.25428572
Buy an ad, gooner
A
Anon07/28/26, 09:31No.25428614
The west as such doesn't have any relation to these semeto-mediterraneo-anatolid traditions western traditions are an import of araboido magicomysteries. Anatolo-hybridised systems coming out of porphyrian-graecian egypto-africanoid priestly tradition found it's way into the west after the medieval period and in the Renaissance. Other than that true western tradition only exists in the form of himmlerian mannerbundus and nature worship. These simpleton barbarians had no spirituality they were just pure hylic troglodyte geezers with tattoos. Their traditions are closer to the Voodoo of southern africa, other than that all the metaphysics are an import of the phanecio-graecid aristotolid platonian corpus cavernosum.Melanin is required for real magic, yakubian installed atlanteans the "copper" red race with magical circuitry in their skin. If you have Scandinavian or anglo-saxon heritage, unless you are a Germanic with Roman ancestry like Hitler (E1b1b1b1b) then you are Jewish science Experiment, genetically modified human cloned in the last 50 years. If you have straight hair then you are a literal fake NPC lab grown science experiment.
A
Anon07/30/26, 13:57No.25433813
Reply image .jpg