A
Anonymous01/28/26, 19:19No.25051562
I was reading pic, and in the first chapter he deals with the changing conception of God from esse to an ens, which became particularly problematic when prots denied the presence of Christ in the Eucharist. But if divinity is purely esse, in what sense can we say that there is divinity specifically in the transubstantiated flesh and blood of Christ? How can we say God is non-spatially in everything yet simultaneously spatially located in this concrete object? That would mean it's more than just esse, wouldn't it?
8
Replies
A
Anon01/28/26, 20:49No.25051713
Who you trying to get crazy with, esse? Don't y
A
Anon01/28/26, 20:54No.25051730
Angry Catholic author seethes about Luther and the Reformation so hard he blames him for everything. This guy probably stubs his toe on the nightstand at night and shouts "damn you, Luther!"Luther believed strongly in transubstantiation and the presence of the Lord during the eucharist, though.
A
Anon01/28/26, 21:04No.25051754
Just read Max Weber and Heidegger and stop bothering with anglo authors who are basically just AI translation tools who corrupt any genuine expertise.
Americans are honestly as bugmen as chinks and indians.