A
Anonymous03/15/26, 07:05No.42950522
Which one would you choose to be?
16
Replies
A
Anon03/15/26, 07:08No.42950543
4’10” easily
A
Anon03/15/26, 07:10No.42950570
Tall women are so cute
A
Anon03/15/26, 07:13No.42950587
Either choice seems like it would be terrible.
A
Anon03/15/26, 07:18No.42950628
if they're cis i'd prefer the one on the left i'd get to be some short king's dream wife instead of pedobait. imagine being the 4'10, having a boy, and they get YOUR height genes. sheesh.
A
Anon03/15/26, 07:23No.42950654
4'10, being a tall girl is preferable up to about 6'4 then it would just get annoying
A
Anon03/15/26, 07:24No.42950662
that woman isnt 7'0 and she is 4'10. that being said 7'0.
A
Anon03/15/26, 07:25No.42950671
I don’t want to be a woman, but 7’0” is bound to come with life shortening health issues and stigma so unfortunately 4’10” and cope.
A
Anon03/15/26, 08:24No.42951039
how the fuck are you under 5' tall but have more than six inches of no boobs between your boobs
A
Anon03/15/26, 09:21No.42951286
I'd totally go 7', just as long as you remove or even just greatly lessen any likely health effects that a genuine seven footer would experience (Margo Dydek died at 37 from heart trouble just from being pregnant while 7'2").That being said, bitch on the left is apparently 'only' about 6'1", and consequently a few inches shy of 7' even in those heels. Her entire online persona is built around exaggerating her and her family's heights. Pic rel's what a natural seven footer looks like (again, Margo Dydek).
A
Anon03/15/26, 09:27No.42951314
4'10 without hesitation.