A
Anonymous09/08/26, 15:14No.65492115New Polish heavy IFV presented
Today, on the military showcase event (MSPO Kielce 2026) Polish state owned military group presented a new heavy IFV prototype (that will take military tests this year) for the Polish army.
Context:
Poland made and already bought a bunch of domestic made IFVs "Borsuk", but it was made with swimming requirement so Borsuk is objectively lightly protected, army wanted a solid heavy armored IFV that will be able to take on more damage, so Polish manufacturers of Borsuk IFV crated a completely new heavy armored chassis (pic), and slapped the same remote turret on it from Borsuk (30mm Bushmaster + 2 spikes).
Borsuk IFV that can swim weights around 28 tons, the new heavy IFV is said to weigh 40 tons (+12 tons).
Article:
https://polskiprzemysl.com.pl/ciezki-bojowy-woz-piechoty/ (in polish, need to translate the page)
Video of new IFV in motion:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLa2OHPveQM
What are your thoughts? As a Pole I'm glad we are making a solid IFV, because Borsuk IFV is kinda a meme with how lightly armored it is because some retarded general force a swimming requirement for it like a decade ago.
40
Replies
A
Anon09/08/26, 15:15No.65492117
The swimming Borsuk IFV on pic
A
Anon09/08/26, 15:23No.65492131
That's a Baneblade
A
Anon09/08/26, 15:49No.65492190
needs APS
A
Anon09/08/26, 16:00No.65492217
>polska mentioned
A
Anon09/08/26, 16:11No.65492259
Why does it have chink camo?
A
Anon09/08/26, 16:14No.65492273
>What are your thoughts? As a Pole I'm glad we are making a solid IFV, because Borsuk IFV is kinda a meme with how lightly armored it is because some retarded general force a swimming requirement for it like a decade ago.This thing is still not armored enough, still not armed enough (I would rather see something like the sherman 75 mm on it with high angle capability) and only an evolution of an already obsolescent design.
A
Anon09/08/26, 16:53No.65492374
This would have been really good for a proper conventional war in the 1980s
A
Anon09/08/26, 16:54No.65492378
Slap some ERA on that bitch
A
Anon09/08/26, 20:48No.65492918
What's the name?
Swimming is Borsuk (do badgers even swim?), so the _heavy_ ver. should be, what, Dzik (boar)?
A
Anon09/08/26, 21:10No.65492973
the design+painting instantly reminded me of chink tanks,
A
Anon09/08/26, 22:53No.65493186
Cannon facing wrong way it needs to shoot drones not infantry.
A
Anon09/08/26, 23:03No.65493211
This is the future of tanks. Basically:
1. Tracked
2. Large enough to carry infantry
3. Light to medium armored only
4. Light(er) weight
5. Remote turret
6. 30-50 mm gun at most, for self defence
7. Some sort of multipurpose BVR missille which is the actual main weapon
8. If not carrying infantry, then space for sensors and comms equipment
A
Anon09/09/26, 00:41No.65493449
Does it feature dead zigger storage?
A
Anon09/09/26, 03:31No.65493962
Is it me or does it look like a panzer 3 at a glance?
A
Anon09/09/26, 03:58No.65494039
>heavy ifv
So, just extra fat & juicy drone target?
>army wanted a solid heavy armored IFV
The fuck wrong with poll-ack army?
Didn't they learn the lethality of drones in modern warfare from ukraine war?
A
Anon09/09/26, 05:35No.65494244
Can it defend itself against drones good?
A
Anon09/09/26, 07:40No.65494350
Oh boy! A new corruption grift to suck EU gibs to while crying that Poland is treated unfairly.
A
Anon09/09/26, 08:29No.65494401
Can't compare to the might of the Red Dragon
