A
Anonymous09/06/26, 20:26No.65487222HYPERSONIC MISSILES
So Iran has threatened to or actually did fire their hypersanic missiles multiple times already and apparently caused zero damage. What's the deal? I thought these magic missiles were going to obsolete carriers and change warfare forever.

69
Replies
A
Anon09/06/26, 20:27No.65487226
Owari da....

A
Anon09/06/26, 20:29No.65487232
i will never forgive russia for ruining the term hypersonic

A
Anon09/06/26, 20:38No.65487258
Oh hey this thread again. Let me give a TLDR before we get started.
>We have missiles!
>We can shoot at your boats!
>Okay well our boats have missile defense systems to shoot them down
>TH-THEN WE WILL BUILD HYPERSONIC MISSILES! THEY WILL GO EVEN FASTER! HAHA WHAT NOW?!!!
>Well we can still see them coming and they’re still aimed at the same targets with missile defense systems that still work so…shoot them down still?
>HAHAHA STUPID AMERIKKKANS WE WILL JUST BLOW UP SOMETHING ELSE THEN IN THE NAME OF ALLAH WHAT THEN?!!!
>Well everything important is covered by them so you’re basically mag dumping diamond bullets into a dirt backstop so…nothing?
>WE WIN AGAIN! FIFTY GORILLION AMERIKKKANS DEAD!
>You blew up a 22 year old Air Reservist from Kentucky that we were about to boot out for being too fat. We just scrapped your entire Air Force and Navy.
>YOU ARE SO SCARED NEXT WE WILL NU-
>We already blew those up.
>THEN WE WILL-
>Blew those up too
>WHAT ABOUT-
>Blew him up too
>WE WIN!
>Youre gay
A
Anon09/06/26, 20:55No.65487314
>hypersonic
Just say ballistic. Do you thirdies even know what hypersonic means?
A
Anon09/07/26, 00:01No.65487743
Iran did not develop HGVs with an economy the size of Connecticut. Their propaganda was just that.
A
Anon09/07/26, 05:54No.65488551
>zero damage
have you seen the state of your country?
A
Anon09/07/26, 06:09No.65488578
An Iranian missile based on a rejected Nork copy of a Soviet SLBM from the 60s..
A
Anon09/07/26, 06:33No.65488614
https://edition.cnn.com/2026/08/04/politics/us-iran-key-missile-interceptors-low
A
Anon09/07/26, 06:49No.65488637
If Iran is so based why haven't they used WMD's on Israel?
A
Anon09/07/26, 06:54No.65488640
BALLISTICS ARE NOT FUCKING HYPERSONICS

A
Anon09/07/26, 11:05No.65488912
Hypersonic are useless unless they’re nuclearFire a $40 million missile that may be intercepted by something 1/40th the prices but even if it doesn’t it’ll like damage a hangar.
A
Anon09/07/26, 14:47No.65489334
If Iran is the master of striking bases why did they stop hitting tel aviv?
A
Anon09/07/26, 15:05No.65489377
Missile spam warfare achieves jak shit.
Welcome to reality.

A
Anon09/07/26, 16:08No.65489564
>the TDS shills copying
Trump already raped iranny so bloody they are prolapsed and shacking.
All iranny managed was making strong statementa and threatening the kikes.
Dont get us angry or we will rape you again.
Fucken shills

A
Anon09/08/26, 08:15No.65491621
Hypersonic is a tenuous term. Trying to trace to where it may have been first used with good intent - I think the idea was to distinguish the speed step where metals melt in extended atmospheric flight and plasma becomes the contact mechanism with the atmosphere. Significant step up from supersonic aircraft in difficulty. And specifically for aircraft so not bullets, not re-entry vehicles it was 1960s-1980s Cold War aerospace terminology. But then got spread around ineptly.
A
Anon09/08/26, 11:12No.65491753
Hypersonic, ballistic, cruise(control for cool), whatever. What matters is if they can actually disable one of the super carriers currently patrolling the gulf. I'll believe it when I see it.
A
Anon09/08/26, 16:54No.65492375
You can't discuss anything on /k/ anymore because so rarely will a thread contain one person with subject matter knowledge, one person with an open mind and one person who speaks English. Without those elements there's no point
A
Anon09/08/26, 19:14No.65492673
idk but here is the haifa refinery getting lit the fuck up back in the 12 day war of last year