A
Anonymous03/08/26, 00:33No.64944327Standardized Suppressor Mount
>current year
>still no standard
what SHOULD be the standard then?
is it just so joeover for us silence maxxing mount chuds? are we cooked famalam? chat, is this for realzies?
94
Replies
A
Anon03/08/26, 00:37No.64944334
HUB is pretty much standardized so there wouldn't need to be a standard mount. I just went with YHM QD because I'm a sucker for ratchet noises.
A
Anon03/08/26, 00:49No.64944364
black duct tape
A
Anon03/08/26, 00:52No.64944375
we're in current year +11
A
Anon03/08/26, 01:34No.64944541
Go over barrel or you're just a larper
A
Anon03/08/26, 01:44No.64944589
>standard mounthere you go
A
Anon03/08/26, 01:49No.64944608
There is. It's called 5/8-24.
A
Anon03/08/26, 01:54No.64944627
HUB for internal threads, Plan B for muzzle threads.
QD anything except Griffin A2 is shit
A
Anon03/08/26, 05:17No.64945134
>what SHOULD be the standard then?
Ase Utra Borelock (but AU are incredible gayniggers about anyone else's suppressors being used with their muzzle devices)
A
Anon03/08/26, 05:21No.64945139
The standard should be an integrated suppressor and an easily removable (and so replacable) barrel like an AUG or AR
A
Anon03/08/26, 06:58No.64945367
The Tri-lug exists so this thread didn’t have to
A
Anon03/08/26, 07:50No.64945477
Why do you talk like a faggot? It really detracts from what you are trying to get across.
A
Anon03/08/26, 21:48No.64947940
Also would anyone like to by some efficient 1/2”x28 fuel filters off YouTube?
A
Anon03/09/26, 13:39No.64949904
The standard for cans should be hub so that R&D in various mounting systems can continue and be incentivized by backwards compatibility and the associated sales volume.We want new and better mount and muzzle device systems and mechanisms. The profit that a company might make off of a new and improved mount and muzzle device suppressor mounting system will be increased if people with older cans are able to adopt the new product. This is best enabled by a sort of universal thread standard of some sort on the can end, IE hub thread 1.375"-24 TPINow if you're asking about a particular mounting system there are a few important considerations.I believe strongly that active multi-layer retention of some sort is a necessary must for the VAST majority of firearms that are set up in the true spirit of the 2nd Amendment. Range toys and hunting rifles need not apply. Similarly, special applications (Liberators, covert guns etc) might be exempt depending on specifics.The functional difference between a suppressed vs unsuppressed firearm is huge. As such it is absolutely a priority to have a suppressor. Active retention is critical insurance because if the suppressor comes unmounted or backs off your risk destroying the suppressor, which less having to do with the cost of repair/replacement, renders the weapon significantly functionally inferior in the sense that once there is a baffle strike, you either remove the suppressor and deal now with the associated reduction in capability from a full report firearm, or you leave the damaged suppressor on and retain suppression, but have a fucked POI due to the baffle strike.This is why the insurance of active retention is so critical, and why direct thread and other "passive" measures like the HUX system don't cut it in my opinion.Now some might say then why not just crank the can down hard direct thread. This isn't unreasonable, but functionally and administratively being able to QD the can is good for transport etc
A
Anon03/09/26, 13:52No.64949929
IMO HUB suppressor + planB with a left hand thread would be perfect. Unfortunately in this day and age everything is mostly Plan B right hand threads which is fine for the most part, but I think left hand threads would give most people a better peace of mind.
A
Anon03/09/26, 14:02No.64949939
Bead of solder
A
Anon03/09/26, 22:26No.64951410
A
Anon03/09/26, 22:50No.64951490
I direct thread my stuff in general. I will give a real answer though vs all the faggot MUH QD MUH TACTICAL ADVANTAGE ones to why someone might legit use a mount: if they're using a light pattern barrel where it's just too thin to properly thread and direct attach. Light hunter or maybe med palma or whatever. I personally prefer to just get a heavier countour and then have it fluted if I want to save weight but for some barrels you just can't do a normal direct attach with all cans.
A
Anon03/11/26, 20:32No.64958557
I’ve got the chance to buy a combo grizzly lathe and press (G4015) for $800. I’ve not done any machining before but I have approved form 1’s. Is it worth buying the lathe with the state of form 1 suppressor making today or am I better off just getting form 4 cans?
A
Anon03/12/26, 01:54No.64959540
ops inc brake and collar is the clear winner here
>first baffle muzzle brake
>all the benefits of qd and direct thread
>can be concentric even on barrels that are not
>can have same oal with more volume because of sleeved design
>are still some of the quietest suppressors made
>simple and relatively inexpensive
A
Anon03/12/26, 02:57No.64959768
Istfg the people who earnestly bitch the most about there being no standard will be the people who bitch the loudest when there is a standard
A
Anon03/12/26, 04:02No.64959943
>trilug
>fast attach
>dt
That's all you need.
A
Anon03/12/26, 16:23No.64961688
Is a viton o-ring good to keep a silencer from walking off a direct thread, or is it going to give me alignment issues? I have a SiCo osprey that just loves walking itself loose after every mag or two.
A
Anon03/13/26, 08:40No.64964723
HUB + Plan B. Wow, that was hard
A
Anon03/13/26, 16:11No.64965819
Qd should be non negotiable because storing your guns with a can on them is a bad idea, the carbon and unburnt powder is hygroscopic and will lead to rust or just shit falling back into the action
A
Anon03/13/26, 16:34No.64965904
How many rounds are you going through to risk unscrewing a DT suppressor? I think my max was 8-9 mags in one range trip and my can felt the same torque wise as when I started.