A
Anonymous10/17/25, 19:21No.18081990
500 Roman legionnaires would chop most of these into dog-meat.
48
Replies
A
Anon10/17/25, 19:23No.18082001
I takes exactly 80 templars to decimate an army
A
Anon10/17/25, 19:25No.18082009
Romans without archers or cavalry against mongols riding around you and shooting arrows at you? Sounds familiar.
A
Anon10/17/25, 19:27No.18082012
I think 3 SEALs all with grenade launchers have a good chance.
A
Anon10/17/25, 19:56No.18082112
I feel like seals are mandatory to prevent them from just sniping you. I'd say them and 50 grenadiers.
A
Anon10/17/25, 20:08No.18082155
250 Mongols and 3 SEALs is by far the best option
A
Anon10/17/25, 20:14No.18082174
do the samurai have guns?
A
Anon10/17/25, 20:16No.18082183
only the vikings and possibly the samurai depending on the era would they stand a chance, the rest are from eras with such tech gaps that they wouldn't stand a chance, just seeing a gun in action would realistically cause them to rout hard
A
Anon10/17/25, 20:17No.18082185
Mongols and Grenadiers
A
Anon10/17/25, 20:28No.18082222
I will take 400 XIX century samurai and 3 navy seals for the radios mostly
A
Anon10/17/25, 20:42No.18082266
If environment, time, logistics are unlimited, and enemy morale is a factor, navy seals to snipe the other gunners/ambush them/kill the mongols horses and Legionaries to form a shield wall around me/buy time guarding the building im in/killing the melee guysIf a straight up arena where everyone attacks at the same time and distance/bullets are limited and the enemy wont run, then vikings to go ballistic and mongols to hopefully run down and kill the gunners before they can pick enough off
A
Anon10/18/25, 00:07No.18082846
Do the seals get like a squad support weapon a vehicle, or the like?
A
Anon10/18/25, 00:10No.18082857
Legionnaires will brought down like Zulu dogs
A
Anon10/18/25, 05:46No.18083513
Seals would easily win if they had a modern vehicle desu
Otherwise mongols because the others are all on foot
A
Anon10/18/25, 05:51No.18083520
>roman legionaries two hours into the teutoberg forest
A
Anon10/18/25, 06:32No.18083605
250 mongols on horses wins.
A
Anon10/18/25, 06:40No.18083619
The Seals could comfortably take out all these faggots, assuming the battlefield has a good line of sight and they get enough ammo.
A
Anon10/18/25, 07:18No.18083654
250 Mongols easily.
A
Anon10/18/25, 08:35No.18083750
A single Templar would crush all of them combined.
A
Anon10/18/25, 08:46No.18083772
Prussians and grenadiers, 80 men drilled to hell and back, give them some time to adapt to a unified command and you can dish out a lot of firepower.Only the americans and janissaries have guns but the difference in numbers for the former and quality for the latter is more than enough overmatch against them
A
Anon10/18/25, 17:25No.18084696
Bump
A
Anon10/18/25, 17:51No.18084755
What year of Prussians. What kit do the seals have. The seals could easily beat everything. The grenadiers could beat every thing except the seals. Unless the Prussians have needle guns. Then its seals and Prussians as top two. I bet 1/100 times the Prussians could beat the seals.
A
Anon10/18/25, 17:53No.18084759
Unless they're fighting on a steppe, its fair to say the 3 SEALs is the safest bet.
A
Anon10/18/25, 17:54No.18084763
Legionnaires would get turned into porcupines from arrows before coming anywhere close to any of those, even vikingsYou cant gap technology with My little dark age hype edits
A
Anon10/18/25, 17:58No.18084772
As a vikingboo myself I feel like whoever made this overestimates the power of vikings. Most vikings were not professional warriors like legionares they were mobs of farmers conscripted by professional warriors,usually noblemen, with the promises of riches and plunder across the seas. They were essentially pirates and were not an organized or standardized military like the roman legions were, which were still not as standardized as modern militaries. Thr average viking would have worn leather and cloth armor and maybe a simple helmet, only the professional warriors wpuld have been wearing what most people imagine when they think of a viking. Chainmail byrnie and helmet woth face mask and all that. Samurai also would have been slaughtered by romans, most wore reed armor ffs.
A
Anon10/18/25, 18:01No.18084778
obviously this is the best choice
A
Anon10/18/25, 19:43No.18085125
>30 prussians
>actually individually the same as the "Grenadiers" only with 30 instead of 50
Why couldn't they at least choose 19th century Prussians or something for the image
A
Anon10/18/25, 19:46No.18085132
I pick 3 navy seals and 500 legionaries. The range would decimiate any of the others and anyone that actually gets close wouldn’t be able to break the disciplined legions. It wouldn’t even be a challenge.
A
Anon10/18/25, 21:03No.18085326
If it's early Prussians
>Seals + Mongols
If it's Franco-Prussian era
>30 Prussians + Seals
A
Anon10/18/25, 22:08No.18085532
I'd take 3 Navy Seals (provided they have enough ammunition) and 50 British Grenadiers. Or else, 50 British Grenadiers and 30 Prussians.
A
Anon10/19/25, 02:04No.18086134
If the 3 navy seals have full ammo and all their standard military equipment, then I pick them and the legionaries.
A
Anon10/19/25, 03:05No.18086291
Correct response is 400 samurai and 3 SEALs
>muh folded steel
No, it's 400 professional horse archers.
A
Anon10/19/25, 06:17No.18086567
SEALs are a massive "it depends". Are they three heavy machine gunners bunkered down with a box of ammo? Yeah they'll probably win. Are they three random SEALs who just stumble across another army? They get destroyed. I think samurai and Mongols are the most consistent to win against the others. 650 horse archers will be a nightmare for the rest to deal with in most scenarios. Hell, just 250 Mongol horse archers and 400 samurai infantry could do the job