A
Anonymous09/09/26, 03:02No.155389266
Hickman's Fantastic Four was his only good run on a comic ever. It was the only time he actually committed and stuck to an idea and didn't have the characters do stuff that's reprehensible and violently out of character for shock value. Hickman sucks but this was pretty okay.
21
Replies
A
Anon09/09/26, 03:03No.155389276
This, he fucked up everything later on.Modern marvel still sucks and the 2000s was the catalyst
A
Anon09/09/26, 03:04No.155389287
his secret warriors and ultimates are also good
he should write Fury more
A
Anon09/09/26, 03:21No.155389498
I feel like part of Hickman's problem is that whenever he was on something he was basically trying to turn it all into an event but with F4 he was just writing F4.
A
Anon09/09/26, 04:02No.155389968
East of West?
A
Anon09/09/26, 04:08No.155390026
The ending is a mess but overall it was a great run and it sticks the landing.
A
Anon09/09/26, 15:18No.155394572
It's probably shit.
A
Anon09/09/26, 15:43No.155394834
I liked his Avengers, but as a Avengers story is bad.
A
Anon09/09/26, 15:44No.155394854
Fantastic Four is objectively his best work. I think opening his run with Reed questioning why he’s been deferring to other’s judgement and decision-making when he’s the smartest man in the world is a fun moral quandary. It’s conclusion feels more concise despite the Council not doing much beyond the initial arc. The vast majority of Hickman’s other comics just feel like he “gives up” in the third act. X-Men and East of West are the biggest culprits. Manhattan Projects he gives up halfway through and Ultimate Spider-Man he gives up a third of the way through.
A
Anon09/09/26, 15:51No.155394944
No, more like is his only good run.
A
Anon09/09/26, 17:37No.155396167
New Avengers is at least kind of interesting
funny-bad at some points
Great Society and all the Namor/Panther stuff was legitimately good
the annual, too, but that’s it