Anon05/19/25, 03:14No.1012320
With code, programmers use it to write small code sections for mundane stuff instead of spitting out the entire program. You can tell it the logic and what you expect, then read its output and fix the stupid stuff it does. It's only beneficial to people who already know how to code, because newbs use it do all their uni assignments and never learn to code. They can't recognise bad code or how to debug their errors, so their skill cap is the AI's skill cap. When you have to write anything more complex than a uni assignment to make a sudoku solver, or work on a large existing codebase, you struggle because AI can't do everything.I'm new to /3d/, so take this with a grain of salt, but instead of inputting a 2d picture and generating a 3d model, I think it'll help with smaller steps in the process. I'm using AI to get ideas for stylised environmental reference art. It's really good at this. While you can't get the proportions for character references, you can get good ideas. Obviously, the underlying skills for reference art are needed, but it'll help the process. It would significantly reduce the market for artists as it's doing for programmers, as all the low-hanging tasks can be done faster with it. The problem is that this is the worst gen ai is ever going to be. It's going to keep improving at a fast pace.